Teams

Forest Lakes

2021 Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over Men · Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over Men 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-26vs ACACWon 20
W#1 SinglesMohan Nadkarni vs Derek Frazier6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRene Roy / Ben Jorgensen vs Steve Kimata / Paul Simko6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-07-19vs CATSWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Cline / Mohan Nadkarni vs Melvin Herndon / Paul Schmidt7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBen Jorgensen / Rene Roy vs Edward Lis / Christopher Hays6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEd Leary / Mathew Wall vs Brian Coffing / Henry Clifford III5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-12vs Boars Head Sports ClubWon 20
W#1 SinglesMohan Nadkarni vs Joseph Park6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBen Jorgensen / Rene Roy vs Lorenzo Davis / Jody Kielbasa6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-28Lost 01
L#1 SinglesEd Leary vs Bruce Pierce6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-06-21vs CATSWon 10
W#2 DoublesRene Roy / Ben Jorgensen vs David Clemens / Christopher Hays6-4, 6-4
2021-06-14vs Boars Head Sports ClubLost 03
L#1 DoublesEd Leary / Michael Cline vs Mark Raffinan / Richards Miller7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMohan Nadkarni / Benjamin Baker vs Jody Kielbasa / Charles Friel6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRene Roy / Mathew Wall vs Tom Martinsen / Mike Greer6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Ed Leary
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.75
Ben Jorgensen
published 4
3.70
John Oliver
published
3.58
Benjamin Baker
published 4
3.57
Mohan Nadkarni
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Rene Roy
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mohan Nadkarni + Ed Leary8646% games−2.8% vs expected
Rene Roy + Mohan Nadkarni2445% gamesnot enough data
Rene Roy + Benjamin Baker134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ed Leary
131W–70L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Ben Jorgensen
10W–10L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
John Oliver
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Benjamin Baker
16W–17L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Mohan Nadkarni
60W–73L career · 4 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Rene Roy
83W–88L career · 5 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.