Teams

Hitchcock 40s 4.0M Wed PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · MEN 4.0 40 & Over Wed PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-16vs Rhoten 40s 4.0M Wed PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn W Quick / Stephen Davis vs Keith Black / Enno de Vries6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCharles Bolton / Ramesh Ravella vs Robert Wells / Jack Walsh1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBill Hitchcock / Lee Brogden vs Vince Credle / Scott Wallace3-6, 5-7
2025-04-09vs Redding/Sherwood 40s 4.0M Wed PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Davis / John W Quick vs Art Fadde / Jason Beuchler6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCharles Bolton / J Stacey Allred vs William Farabow / Chris Keiner1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPreston Davenport / Tom Dembowiak vs Peter Georges / Jeff Reichard3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 40 & Over Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Brad McAmis
published 4
3.75
Ramesh Ravella
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
John W Quick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Stanley Marrow
published
3.43
J Stacey Allred
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Beecher Owen
published 3.5
Brian Newton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Bill Hitchcock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Lee Brogden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Preston Davenport
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ric Parker
published
Steven Brackman
published
Tom Dembowiak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad McAmis
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Ramesh Ravella
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
John W Quick
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.60
Stanley Marrow
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
J Stacey Allred
12W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.43
3.5
Beecher Owen
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Brian Newton
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Bill Hitchcock
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Lee Brogden
8W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Preston Davenport
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ric Parker
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Brackman
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Dembowiak
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.