Alberta Banks-Cobb

2025 · 26 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

Schedule

Flight standings for 26 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72

Sandy McQueen

usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published —

3.54

Tracee Smith

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published —

3.53

Ashley Hooie

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 3.5

3.51

Taryn Sobh

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

3.46

Jackie Palmer

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published —

3.43

Valentina Ichim

usually #1 Singles 64%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published —

3.38

Lori Imhof

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published —

3.38

Eileen Cobb

usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published —

3.38

Lindsay Hofmann

usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published —

3.37

Candi Harris

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.30

Maridell Banks

usually #4 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published —

3.28

Jamie Bak

usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published —

3.23

Sue Mayer

usually #4 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published —

3.23

Shana Wolfe

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published —

3.19

Jennifer Harvieux

usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published —

3.15

Stacy de Rogatis

usually #4 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published —

3.15

Anne Sepko

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published 3.5

3.12

Susan Cangelosi

usually #4 Doubles 100% · published —

3.10

Mary Geil

usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #4 Doubles 44% · published —

3.07

Sheila Devaney

published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maridell Banks + Eileen Cobb	7–0	70% games	+8.6% vs expected
Ashley Hooie + Taryn Sobh	22–3	67% games	+7.7% vs expected
Ashley Hooie + Sandy McQueen	3–3	57% games	+6.1% vs expected
Anne Sepko + Ashley Hooie	7–2	55% games	+3.5% vs expected
Anne Sepko + Mary Geil	11–7	53% games	+0.9% vs expected
Lindsay Hofmann + Candi Harris	14–5	58% games	+0.4% vs expected
Ashley Hooie + Candi Harris	14–6	60% games	+0.4% vs expected
Ashley Hooie + Stacy de Rogatis	4–2	60% games	+0.3% vs expected

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

Sandy McQueen

71W–34L career · 10 lines in 2026

0%<1%>99%

3.72

—

Tracee Smith

16W–5L career · 9 lines in 2026

<1%38%62%

3.54

3.5

Ashley Hooie

119W–41L career · 13 lines in 2026

<1%41%59%

3.53

—

Taryn Sobh

88W–29L career · 12 lines in 2026

<1%47%53%

3.51

—

Jackie Palmer

33W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026

<1%61%38%

3.46

—

Valentina Ichim

53W–21L career · 14 lines in 2026

<1%68%32%

3.43

—

Lori Imhof

37W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026

<1%79%21%

3.38

—

Eileen Cobb

63W–29L career · 10 lines in 2026

<1%80%20%

3.38

—

Lindsay Hofmann

105W–44L career · 13 lines in 2026

<1%80%20%

3.38

3.5

Candi Harris

62W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026

<1%82%18%

3.37

—

Maridell Banks

90W–47L career · 6 lines in 2026

2%91%8%

3.30

—

Jamie Bak

82W–33L career · 8 lines in 2026

<1%2%98%

3.28

—

Sue Mayer

21W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026

5%92%3%

3.23

—

Shana Wolfe

6W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026

5%92%3%

3.23

—

Jennifer Harvieux

14W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026

8%90%1%

3.19

—

Stacy de Rogatis

73W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026

14%86%1%

3.15

3.5

Anne Sepko

34W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026

14%85%1%

3.15

—

Susan Cangelosi

34W–28L career · 1 line in 2026

20%80%<1%

3.12

—

Mary Geil

48W–27L career · 9 lines in 2026

23%77%<1%

3.10

—

Sheila Devaney

19W–38L career · no lines in 2026

32%68%<1%

3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.