Teams

PA Ponstine SSL A55-8.0M

2022 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 55&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI SSL A55&O 8.0 M (6 player)

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-17vs MVR Dear SSL A55-8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesDanny Balfour / James Jantz vs Chris Peceny / Paul Brown1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Kohley / Jack Ponstine vs Jim DeLaFuente / Patrick McCabe4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesEric Dreisbach / Martin Inchauste vs Mark Krupp / Charles White6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-06vs MVH Hall SSL A55-8.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Bont / Jack Ponstine vs Steve McKee / Edo Mestrom3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonald Klinge / Tom Chandler vs John Grise / John Hendricks4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesEric Dreisbach / Martin Inchauste vs Jeffrey Hall / Paul Sedlacek6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-08vs MVR Dear SSL A55-8.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesMartin Inchauste / Donald Klinge vs Chris Peceny / Patrick McCabe2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoseph Kohley / Danny Balfour vs Jim DeLaFuente / Dale Momber6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesEric Dreisbach / Scott Bont vs Mark Krupp / Charles White6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2022-03-25vs MVH Hall SSL A55-8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesEric Dreisbach / Martin Inchauste vs Jon Kroeze / Tom Olson2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesScott Bont / Jack Ponstine vs Bruce Fedewa / John Grise4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDonald Klinge / Thomas Vander Lugt vs Michael Fowler / John Hendricks1-6, 3-6
2022-02-25vs MVR Dear SSL A55-8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesDanny Balfour / Tom Chandler vs Chris Peceny / Douglas Shymko4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJames Jantz / Thomas Vander Lugt vs Patrick McCabe / Paul Brown4-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDale Elders / Donald Klinge vs Mark Krupp / Jim DeLaFuente4-6, 3-6
2022-02-11vs MVH Hall SSL A55-8.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarc Rabitoy / Thomas Vander Lugt vs Jon Kroeze / Tom Olson4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJames Jantz / Danny Balfour vs Steve McKee / Jeffrey Hall4-6, 5-6
W#3 DoublesScott Bont / Jack Ponstine vs Edo Mestrom / Ray Buursma6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WMI SSL A55&O 8.0 M (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVH Hall SSL A55-8.0M5114411131
2MVR Dear SSL A55-8.0M339921170
3PA Ponstine SSL A55-8.0M1541429189

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
James Jantz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.59
Jack Ponstine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.30
Scott Bont
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.27
Eric Dreisbach
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Dale Elders
published 3.5
3.21
Donald Klinge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Danny Balfour
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Joseph Kohley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Marc Rabitoy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Martin Inchauste
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Thomas Vander Lugt
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tom Chandler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donald Klinge + Jack Ponstine6349% games+4.0% vs expected
Scott Bont + Eric Dreisbach3551% games−0.4% vs expected
Jack Ponstine + Scott Bont4747% games−6.9% vs expected
Joseph Kohley + James Jantz5544% gamesnot enough data
Donald Klinge + Martin Inchauste0718% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Kohley + Scott Bont2444% gamesnot enough data
Donald Klinge + Eric Dreisbach2344% gamesnot enough data
Martin Inchauste + Eric Dreisbach1435% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Jantz
55W–21L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Jack Ponstine
51W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Scott Bont
60W–107L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Eric Dreisbach
107W–115L career · 12 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Dale Elders
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Donald Klinge
27W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Danny Balfour
10W–20L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Kohley
35W–58L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marc Rabitoy
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Martin Inchauste
10W–42L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Vander Lugt
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tom Chandler
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.