Teams

TCSA Top Spinners

2025 18 & OVER SPRING Saturday Men · 3.5 MEN

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-07vs G LeagueWon 50
W#1 DoublesKishore Babu Kancharlapalli / Matthew Castillo vs Dale Paustian / Scott House2-6, 2-1
W#1 SinglesAlex Sundin vs Jeff Moe6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoshua Hernandez / Caleb Pallapati vs Frank Schycker / Calvin Mein6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesPhilip Connell vs Darren Engh6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Martinez / Mallesh Pailee vs Ricky Shasteen / Matt Garrity3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Patrick Reyes
published
Alex Sundin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.51
Caleb Pallapati
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Shankar Chelakarai
published
3.43
Philip Connell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Matthew Castillo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Rolando Gonzalez
published
3.29
Kishore Babu Kancharlapalli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Sebastian Padilla
published
3.22
Kishore Kamaraju
published
3.16
Vamsi Krishna
published
3.12
Mallesh Pailee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Moore
published 3
Richard Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sunil Gandra
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shankar Chelakarai + Rolando Gonzalez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick Reyes
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Alex Sundin
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Caleb Pallapati
18W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Shankar Chelakarai
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Philip Connell
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Matthew Castillo
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Rolando Gonzalez
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Kishore Babu Kancharlapalli
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Sebastian Padilla
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Kishore Kamaraju
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Vamsi Krishna
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Mallesh Pailee
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
3
John Moore
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Martinez
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sunil Gandra
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.