Teams

RCCB - Rosenquist

2021 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-01vs Suntree-McLaughlinLost 02
L#1 SinglesTee Wells vs Amy Gregory0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Rosenquist / Kristen Crisafulli vs Sharon Bean / Sarah Hirji3-6, 2-6
2021-02-26Split 11
W#1 SinglesShelly Rosseau vs Tracee Moecker6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMary Hoyt / Tee Wells vs Robin Panicola / Jeannette Jarnes4-6, 4-6
2021-02-17vs Brevard - TTC / LauSplit 11
W#1 SinglesShelly Rosseau vs Pauline Mitchell6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMelissa Rosenquist / Kim Viesins vs Tanya Molony / Dawn Pfeil4-6, 6-7
2021-02-08vs Kiwi - RamseyLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine McGraw / Christine Small vs Judy Thomas / Karen Fitzmaurice7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelissa Rosenquist / Shelly Rosseau vs Leesa Brambach / Tina Murphy4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTee Wells / Christina Morrill vs Tracey Draper / Tracy Famiano4-6, 2-6
2021-01-25vs Rockledge - SorrickSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTee Wells vs Ingrid Meier0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesShelly Rosseau / Melissa Rosenquist vs Teresa Blair / Dottie Sorrick3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-01-24vs Viera - MelendezSplit 11
W#1 SinglesShelly Rosseau vs Nancy Hastings6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMelissa Rosenquist / Kim Viesins vs Sherry Houston / Jennifer Jackson6-7, 4-6
2021-01-11vs TTC - UrbanLost 02
L#1 SinglesShelly Rosseau vs Julie Cole2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Small / Mary Hoyt vs Mary Beardall / Anna Farach6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Shelly Rosseau
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Kristen Crisafulli
published
3.28
Tee Wells
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Melissa Rosenquist
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Anne Barto
published 3
Christine McGraw
published 3
2.44
Christine Small
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kim Viesins
published
Mary Hoyt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Rosenquist + Shelly Rosseau2545% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Rosenquist + Tee Wells213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Shelly Rosseau
96W–74L career · 6 lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
3.47
Kristen Crisafulli
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Tee Wells
129W–96L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Melissa Rosenquist
64W–82L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
3
Anne Barto
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Christine McGraw
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Christine Small
76W–122L career · 2 lines in 2021
67%33%<1%
2.44
Kim Viesins
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Hoyt
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.