Teams

C.Whited/C.Ennis

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-08vs L.Veit/A.BakerWon 10
W#1 DoublesJenna Dysart / Karen Wakeford vs Patricia Weston / Kelly Burkhardt6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-01vs L.ClarkWon 10
W#2 SinglesJenna Dysart vs Brittany Humphrey6-1, 6-2
2023-04-24vs E.BlackLost 01
L#1 DoublesCristina Ennis / Celia Whited vs Elizabeth Black / Caroline Fungaroli2-6, 6-7
2023-04-17vs E.MerrittSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJenna Dysart / Kathy Saieed vs Alison Uthe / Elizabeth Merritt6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCelia Whited vs Amy Clarke6-3, 6-2
2023-04-13vs C.ByrumLost 01
L#1 DoublesCelia Whited / Karen Wakeford vs Nora Stacey / Debra Hauge6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-03-29vs K.HuffstetlerWon 10
W#2 SinglesJenna Dysart vs Brittany Shumaker6-0, 6-0
2023-03-24vs M.GreenWon 10
W#2 DoublesJenna Dysart / Karen Wakeford vs Kate Pirrung / Marilyn Slaymaker6-2, 6-2
2023-03-20vs M.GonellaLost 02
L#2 SinglesCelia Whited vs Mary Grace Marlow6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJenna Dysart / Jennifer Bissette vs Margaret Ann Gonella / Kari Knoblauch6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2023-03-06vs J.MitchellWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenna Dysart / Karen Wakeford vs Priscilla Nanney / Mary Strothmann6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCelia Whited / Jennifer Bissette vs Suzy Kaelin / Kellie Bradley6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Mallory Biringer
published 4
Celia Whited
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Cristina Ennis
published 3.5
3.21
Jenna Dysart
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
3.00
Karen Wakeford
published
2.81
Lindsey Taylor
published
2.74
Jennifer Bissette
published
2.56
Taylor Cheek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celia Whited + Jenna Dysart213 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Bissette + Taylor Cheek213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mallory Biringer
104W–47L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
4.07
3.5
Celia Whited
79W–80L career · 12 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Cristina Ennis
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Jenna Dysart
97W–58L career · 12 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Karen Wakeford
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
Lindsey Taylor
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Jennifer Bissette
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
2.74
Taylor Cheek
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
34%65%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.