Teams

CherokeeBluff HS-Floyd

2026 NEGTA Southern Combo 40 & Over - Summer · Women 6.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.20 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-22vs Chateau Elan-GrattonWon 21
W#1 DoublesRenee Adams / Michelle Ashwood vs Amie Foster / Stephanie Joedecke6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Dalrymple / Liz Murphy vs TAMARA MAELLARO / Karen Gratton3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLindsay Hofmann / Lori D'Adamio vs Sonya Watts / Ashley Underwood6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-15vs CCC-ReevesWon 30
W#1 DoublesRenee Adams / Diane Carr vs Brooke Johnson / Ellen Lark6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Dalrymple / Lindsay Hofmann vs Julie McCoy / Lynn McGee6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Almon / Liz Murphy vs Maggie Bennett / Julie Katz6-4, 6-2
2026-07-08vs City Park- HermesLost 12
L#1 DoublesRenee Adams / Michelle Ashwood vs Nancy Gravitt / Jennifer Loggins3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Hetzel / Lori Warren vs Paula Fagan / Carmen Hermes2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLindsay Hofmann / Stewart Mary Jo vs Alison Lamay / Lesley Melson7-6, 6-2
2026-07-01vs Chateau Elan-GrattonWon 21
W#1 DoublesRenee Adams / Michelle Ashwood vs Christine McClendon / Jenn Seaton4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiane Carr / Michele Hetzel vs Christine Jackson / Katie Grant0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAshley Hooie / Lori Warren vs Michelle Calvert / Anne Hotte Walls7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-24vs CCC-ReevesWon 21
W#1 DoublesRenee Adams / Michelle Ashwood vs Allyson Reeves / Brandi Barber6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori D'Adamio / Liz Murphy vs Janice Johnson / Stacy King2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStewart Mary Jo / Connie-Sue Oriel vs Julie Katz / Maggie Bennett4-6, 5-7
2026-06-17vs City Park- HermesLost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Dalrymple / Lindsay Hofmann vs Nancy Gravitt / Jennifer Loggins3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLiz Murphy / Rae Hewatt vs Patty Bettencourt / Martha Darby6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStewart Mary Jo / Taryn Sobh vs Carmen Hermes / Lesley Melson6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1City Park- Hermes4212614147
2CherokeeBluff HS-Floyd4211720163
3CCC-Reeves2471123175
4Chateau Elan-Gratton2461228194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Ashley Hooie
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.51
Taryn Sobh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Lindsay Hofmann
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.30
Liz Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Connie-Sue Oriel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Melissa Almon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Diane Carr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.02
Chris Dalrymple
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.02
Michelle Ashwood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Lori D'Adamio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Lori Warren
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Stewart Mary Jo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Rae Hewatt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Jamie Floyd
published
2.68
Michele Hetzel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Hooie + Taryn Sobh22367% games+7.7% vs expected
Michelle Ashwood + Lori D'Adamio8361% games+6.3% vs expected
Chris Dalrymple + Michelle Ashwood4353% games+2.1% vs expected
Connie-Sue Oriel + Stewart Mary Jo3741% games−2.3% vs expected
Chris Dalrymple + Lori D'Adamio3652% games−4.9% vs expected
Lindsay Hofmann + Ashley Hooie11656% games−13.8% vs expected
Diane Carr + Lori Warren224 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Floyd + Christina Higgins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Hooie
119W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
Taryn Sobh
88W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Lindsay Hofmann
105W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Liz Murphy
14W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Connie-Sue Oriel
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Melissa Almon
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Diane Carr
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Chris Dalrymple
44W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Michelle Ashwood
41W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Lori D'Adamio
43W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Lori Warren
20W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
Stewart Mary Jo
29W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Rae Hewatt
14W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Jamie Floyd
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Christina Higgins
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Michele Hetzel
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.