Teams

Camilla/Shiver

2025 Flint River USTA MXD 18 & Over - Winter · MXD 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-08vs Thomasville/ThriffileyWon 10
W#1 DoublesCoy Chambers / Nikki Hall vs George Thomas Harrison / Anna Lee6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-11-23vs Bainbridge/HeardWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelley Corbari / Coy Chambers vs Gina Bell / Stephen Mayfield6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2024-11-20vs Thomasville/ThriffileyLost 01
L#3 DoublesKelley Corbari / Coy Chambers vs Dale Wing / Elizabeth Ford1-6, 3-6
2024-11-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesCoy Chambers / Kelley Corbari vs Rhonda Tullos / Alden Harrison6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MXD 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Erica Hilliard
published
3.86
Matthew Hilliard
published
3.68
Nikki Hall
published
3.67
Coy Chambers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Brandi Byce
published 4
3.58
Cindy Anglin
published 4
3.43
Chris Anglin
published 4
3.40
Bobby York
published 4
3.40
Kelley Corbari
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Becky Bush
published 3.5
3.17
Jeff Davis
published
2.72
Carol Shiver
published 3
JaneMarie Dinnerman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelley Corbari + Becky Bush7268% games+8.5% vs expected
Erica Hilliard + Matthew Hilliard5260% games+0.8% vs expected
Kelley Corbari + Jeff Davis303 matchesnot enough data
Carol Shiver + Jeff Davis033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erica Hilliard
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
Matthew Hilliard
13W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Nikki Hall
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Coy Chambers
71W–99L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Brandi Byce
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Cindy Anglin
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Chris Anglin
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.43
4
Bobby York
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
3.5
Kelley Corbari
177W–180L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Becky Bush
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Jeff Davis
5W–16L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Carol Shiver
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
JaneMarie Dinnerman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.