Teams

SS-H TEAL

2023 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-19vs HV PURPLELost 02
L#1 SinglesAllisa Lacey vs Kellina Flansburg4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKrista Barthel / Melissa Gilkison vs Laura Conry / Laurie Korff3-6, 2-6
2023-07-12vs HFII REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Gilkison / Shauna Laird vs Kathy Hoover / Laura Fraser7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2023-07-05vs WC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Haar / Allisa Lacey vs Monica Feldman / Elana Mamayan3-6, 2-6
2023-06-28vs EM NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllisa Lacey / Melissa Gilkison vs Kesa Sullivan / Cissie Busch6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-06-21vs HG REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Haar / Allisa Lacey vs Dana McDermott / Katie Mercier6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-14vs HRCA-N TEALWon 10
W#1 SinglesAllisa Lacey vs Machelle Jungerman6-4, 6-4
2023-06-07vs CCV GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Gilkison / Shauna Laird vs Jennifer Abrams / Manuela Seewald6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Melissa Gilkison
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Allisa Lacey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.24
Jennifer Haar
published
2.23
Shauna Laird
published
1.94
Kelly MacFarlane
published
1.87
Julia Prendergast
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allisa Lacey + Melissa Gilkison5748% games+9.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Melissa Gilkison
42W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Allisa Lacey
25W–40L career · 5 lines in 2023
15%85%1%
2.65
Jennifer Haar
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.24
Shauna Laird
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.23
Kelly MacFarlane
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Julia Prendergast
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.