Teams

Clark/LR/Rebs

2025 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-02-09vs Junior/LR/RebLost 03
L#1 SinglesJennifer Dartez vs Lynn Stone2-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMolly Murdock vs Kelsy Knox3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesChrista Clark vs Anita Junior2-6, 2-6
2026-01-12vs Rutledge/LR/RebsWon 21
W#1 SinglesHannah Lewis vs Melaney Gee6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesChrista Clark vs Katie Rutledge1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMorgan Bridgforth vs Tiffanie Taylor6-2, 6-1
2025-12-22vs Brown/LR/RebLost 02
L#1 SinglesJennifer Dartez vs Lacey Watts0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMolly Murdock vs Abby Barr3-6, 0-6
2025-12-14vs Brown/LR/RebWon 21
L#1 SinglesMorgan Bridgforth vs Anna Morshedi0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMolly Murdock vs Erika Johnson6-4, 4-3
W#3 SinglesAnna Catherine Cargile vs Kharyssa Brown6-3, 5-4
2025-12-10vs Rutledge/LR/RebsWon 30
W#1 SinglesHannah Lewis vs Carmen Scruggs6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMolly Murdock vs Brittany Richardson Watson6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAnna Catherine Cargile vs Tiffanie Taylor6-3, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Clark/LR/Rebs327816131
2Sullivan/Overley/LR/CCLR3381021162
3Rutledge/LR/Rebs1781630231

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Molly Murdock
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Morgan Bridgforth
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.30
Hannah Lewis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
2.84
Anna Catherine Cargile
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.75
Lydia Hunjan
published
2.56
Christa Clark
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
Jennifer Dartez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Murdock + Hannah Lewis11162% games+18.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Murdock
28W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Morgan Bridgforth
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.37
4
Hannah Lewis
28W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.30
3
Anna Catherine Cargile
19W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
Lydia Hunjan
31W–25L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Christa Clark
11W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
Jennifer Dartez
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.