Teams

Fall Winners - Marco YMCA - Gauch

2022 Collier Mixed 55 & Over Fall · 2022 Mixed 55 & over 7.0 Fall

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-11-27vs Players Club - BifaroWon 10
W#1 DoublesBen Yocom / Mary Fischer vs Keith Wauters / Jill Wauters4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-11-14vs Cambier - M.SmileyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Fischer / Ben Yocom vs Jacqui ONeal Privitere / Phillip McKee6-3, 6-3
2021-11-13vs Fiddlers Creek - D. KeelyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Fischer / Ben Yocom vs Mark Garrett / Victoria Pollock6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2021-10-23vs Players Club - M. LeonardWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Fischer / Ben Yocom vs Coleen Mohler / Robert Joseph6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSusan Julich / Tim Huffman vs Claire Morris / Frank Ciriello6-3, 6-2
2021-10-16vs Village Walk Bonita - J. MartinLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Fischer / Ben Yocom vs Barbara Hess / Jonathan Hyland3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 Mixed 55 & over 7.0 Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Elizabeth Burton
published 4
3.68
David Ceryak
published 3.5
3.44
Susan Julich
published
3.43
Tim Huffman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Ben Yocom
published 3.5
3.41
Andy Mintz
published 3.5
3.29
Ramsay Erickson
published
3.16
Corey Stranger
published 3.5
3.03
Reimar Gauch
published
Jennifer Ball
published
Leticia Lancsarics
published
Mark Waks
published
Mary Fischer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Fischer + Ben Yocom4164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Burton
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
3.5
David Ceryak
3W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%9%91%
3.68
Susan Julich
26W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
Tim Huffman
15W–25L career · 2 lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Ben Yocom
33W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Andy Mintz
27W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
3.41
Ramsay Erickson
16W–25L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Corey Stranger
223W–172L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Reimar Gauch
59W–55L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03
Jennifer Ball
19W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leticia Lancsarics
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Waks
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Fischer
122W–111L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.