Teams

Nguyen-Shaolin Soccer

2025 One Doubles-Winter · 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.10 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-08vs Widrow-Third Times A CharmLost 01
L#1 DoublesDevon Newsom / Jung Shin vs Robert Peters / George Ramirez4-6, 2-6
2025-04-05vs Taylor/HirschLost 01
L#1 DoublesDevon Newsom / Michael Riggin vs Steve Hirsch / Charles Taylor2-6, 3-6
2025-03-27vs James/MagnusonLost 01
L#1 DoublesYoungho Kim / Devon Newsom vs Tres James / Jett Magnuson4-6, 3-6
2025-03-23vs Widrow-Third Times A CharmWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Riggin / Jung Shin vs George Ramirez / RJ Widrow6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-23vs SWW-HarnLost 01
L#1 DoublesTim Nguyen / Andrew Ta vs Michael Harn / James Maxfields3-6, 5-7
2025-03-13vs SWW-HarnWon 10
W#1 DoublesDevon Newsom / Michael Riggin vs Dan Crowell / James Maxfields6-3, 7-5
2025-03-06vs GavinLost 01
L#1 DoublesTim Nguyen / Andrew Ta vs Steve Racine / Sergio Mir Arenas3-6, 3-6
2025-02-28vs Taylor/HirschWon 10
W#1 DoublesJung Shin / Michael Riggin vs Mike Shaffer / Steve Hirsch7-5, 6-3
2025-02-16vs GavinLost 01
L#1 DoublesTim Nguyen / Andrew Ta vs Sergio Mir Arenas / Dallas Sloan1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SWW-Harn9191663
2Gavin55551084
3Widrow-Third Times A Charm55551180
4Nguyen-Shaolin Soccer46461399
5James/Magnuson191918116

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Michael Riggin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Tim Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Jung Shin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Andrew Ta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Devon Newsom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Youngho Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Ta + Tim Nguyen102444% games−3.1% vs expected
Jung Shin + Devon Newsom1431% games−12.7% vs expected
Michael Riggin + Devon Newsom213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michael Riggin
48W–25L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
3
Tim Nguyen
11W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
Jung Shin
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Andrew Ta
17W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.67
3
Devon Newsom
6W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
3
Youngho Kim
0W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.