Teams

HOLDING WOMEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & Over LOUISVILLE · Additional Players

7 players · average NTRP / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · Additional Players
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1holding men000000
2HOLDING WOMEN000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Shelia Colyer
published
2.90
Laura Spillman
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Iulia Brockman
published
2.49
Robin Krawiec
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jackie Cobb
published
Kathy Lesmeister
published
Mary Helen Davis
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelia Colyer
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Laura Spillman
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
2.90
Iulia Brockman
8W–5L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.72
Robin Krawiec
3W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
Jackie Cobb
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Lesmeister
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Helen Davis
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.