Teams

Drew Clevenger-Moores Mill

2025 Auburn Ladies Monday Mornings Spring · 2.5-4.5 Ladies

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-19vs Team Sara Nolin-Monday MorningsWon 31
W#1 DoublesTomoko Maeda / Cindy Colton vs Darlene Skier / Ellen Sharan6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPam Yantis-Bell / Laura Braswell vs Julie Cullins / Seonmi Yu2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesColley Hatchett / Taylor Griffin vs Sun Ah Jung / Keumhee Lee6-1, 6-1
L#4 DoublesShakela Johnson / Kate Finkel vs Sunja Yi / Jungeun Lee6-7, 4-6
2025-05-05vs Team Sara Nolin-Monday MorningsWon 31
W#1 DoublesCindy Colton / Whitney Davis vs Marissa Rozman / Ginelle Weissinger6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPam Yantis-Bell / Colley Hatchett vs Beth Huddleston / Kate Ham4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Braswell / Dawn Duffie vs Seonmi Yu / Lisa Jorgensen7-5, 7-5
L#4 DoublesShakela Johnson / Kate Finkel vs Jungeun Lee / Keumhee Lee3-6, 4-6
2025-04-28vs Team Sara Nolin-Monday MorningsLost 13
L#1 DoublesDawn Duffie / Pam Yantis-Bell vs Ellen Sharan / Darlene Skier4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTaylor Griffin / Kate Finkel vs Beth Huddleston / Kate Ham2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Sasser / Colley Hatchett vs Sara Nolin / Julie Cullins6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesLaura Braswell / Shakela Johnson vs Sunja Yi / Lisa Jorgensen4-6, 2-6
2025-04-21vs Team Sara Nolin-Monday MorningsLost 12
W#1 DoublesTomoko Maeda / Cindy Colton vs Marissa Rozman / Ginelle Weissinger6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKelly Sasser / Whitney Davis vs Julie Cullins / Kate Ham0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesShakela Johnson / Laura Braswell vs Sun Ah Jung / Keumhee Lee2-6, 5-7
2025-04-14vs Team Sara Nolin-Monday MorningsLost 13
W#1 DoublesCindy Colton / Tomoko Maeda vs Ginelle Weissinger / Darlene Skier2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDawn Duffie / Taylor Griffin vs Marissa Rozman / Kate Ham2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Braswell / Kate Finkel vs Sara Nolin / Lisa Jorgensen6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesKelly Sasser / Shakela Johnson vs Sunja Yi / Keumhee Lee3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5-4.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Colley Hatchett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dawn Duffie
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Tomoko Maeda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Whitney Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Erin Ainsworth
published
2.58
Cindy Colton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
2.36
Kate Finkel
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.12
Laura Braswell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
2.04
Shakela Johnson
usually #4 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Kelly Sasser
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Pam Yantis-Bell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Taylor Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tracy Parsons
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tomoko Maeda + Cindy Colton303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Colley Hatchett
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dawn Duffie
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tomoko Maeda
32W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.18
Whitney Davis
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.85
Erin Ainsworth
20W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.77
4
Cindy Colton
7W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
>99%<1%0%
2.58
Kate Finkel
15W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
Laura Braswell
8W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Shakela Johnson
8W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Kelly Sasser
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pam Yantis-Bell
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Griffin
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Parsons
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.