Teams

CACM RED

2022 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.95 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-03vs GAC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesDaniel Chin / Barbara Chin vs Patrick Reed / Monica Hustead6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTim Gerlach / Emily Loyd vs Mary Loughran / Dave MacMaster6-1, 6-1
2022-06-26vs GPTC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesAli Barghelame / Jena Dupont vs Katy Donnelly / Matthew Wiens6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEmily Loyd / Tim Gerlach vs Guerin Green / Christine Hong7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesWill Beutelschies / Megan Ryall vs Lani Reichardt / Christopher Seerveld6-3, 6-4
2022-06-19vs GTC NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Chin / Daniel Chin vs Sally Berglund / Sean Essex2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHervey Pierre / Helen Young vs Paul Jaszewski / Lori Bowling1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMegan Ryall / Will Beutelschies vs Amy Chase / Josh Lozow1-6, 2-6
2022-06-12vs CM GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesAli Barghelame / Jill Barghelame vs Shannon Burke / Clay Schneiter5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Chin / Daniel Chin vs Diana McKee / Matthew Fortney6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMegan Ryall / Will Beutelschies vs Janine Melberg / Eli Anderson6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2022-06-05vs EM REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesCraig Claxton / Helen Young vs Lisa OConnor / Sean OConnor0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAli Barghelame / Jena Dupont vs Kristin Kuruvila / Gregory Fritsch6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEmily Loyd / Tim Gerlach vs Beattie Leonard / Pia Lisle6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-29vs GTC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesHervey Pierre / Carmencita Lewis vs Nate Moeller / Jennifer Thomas6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Chin / Barbara Chin vs John Darden / Patricia Olson6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAli Barghelame / Jena Dupont vs Eric Mayer / Kay Roesch7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJ TEAL701927127
2GTC NAVY601538133
3SSLT GREEN6115614152
4SH GREEN6114720203
5CACM RED5113514135
6LTFC NAVY5212925201
7KNO RED4314717180
8CACI RED4312919155
9NJ GOLD339921175
10LTFC BLUE34101123188
11MC ORANGE3491225178
12LTC BLUE3491228211
13CM GREEN1551328188
14GPTC BLUE1541429187
15SSHP YELLOW0621634213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Hervey Pierre
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Jena Dupont
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Carmencita Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Barbara Chin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Ali Barghelame
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Craig Claxton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Jill Barghelame
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Megan Ryall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Daniel Chin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.36
Will Beutelschies
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Emily Loyd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tim Gerlach
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Chin + Barbara Chin201253% games+4.0% vs expected
Megan Ryall + Will Beutelschies132345% games−2.6% vs expected
Ali Barghelame + Jill Barghelame10550% games−4.9% vs expected
Emily Loyd + Tim Gerlach4254% gamesnot enough data
Hervey Pierre + Carmencita Lewis3255% gamesnot enough data
Jena Dupont + Ali Barghelame314 matchesnot enough data
Craig Claxton + Carmencita Lewis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hervey Pierre
86W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Jena Dupont
83W–106L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Carmencita Lewis
34W–19L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Barbara Chin
50W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Ali Barghelame
57W–58L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Craig Claxton
42W–44L career · 1 line in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Jill Barghelame
90W–83L career · 1 line in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Megan Ryall
111W–112L career · 3 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Daniel Chin
46W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Will Beutelschies
38W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Emily Loyd
15W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tim Gerlach
13W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.