Teams

SD 4.0 Barnes TC (2:2)/ Bucky

2026 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD WD · SD - Women - 4.0 WD

17 players · average NTRP 3.73 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-25vs SD 4.0 Balboa TC (3:1)/ DavisLost 13
L#1 DoublesJenelle Aris / Amanda Barnard vs Kanoko Esheim / Tenley Gritts2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNichole Dolinsky vs Carolina Carreno3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Shehab / Carolyn Pringle vs Becky Yzaguirre / Susan Davis7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLeanne Mariano / Gwen Schulz vs Susan Graham / Lisa Mallory4-6, 1-6
2026-03-11vs SD 4.0 SDTRC (3:1)/ KaufmanLost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bucky / Melissa Mead vs Adelle Danson / Soledad Ramirez5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNichole Dolinsky vs Susan Faltico4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJenelle Aris / Amanda Barnard vs Sandy Dielman / Noelle Randall3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHelen Farr / Lori Lovering vs Krista Losito / Carrie Musicant6-4, 6-4
2026-03-04vs SD 4.0 La Jolla TC (3:1)/ BourneSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Pringle / Jessica Shehab vs Anne Blackburn / LUISA BAKAY5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesClare Lemon vs Deborah Fitzgerald7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Strachan / Jenelle Aris vs Terri Bourne / Dominique Gambale6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Bruno / Andrea Van Soest vs Shelley Shalev / Janene Christopher2-6, 0-6
2026-02-25vs SD LLW 4.0WD Mtn View/ LeeSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLeanne Mariano / Gwen Schulz vs Wendy Burgoon / Linda la Terza2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Mead vs CAROLINA MENDIVIL4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Hansen / Michelle Strachan vs Brandy Baray / Miho Nakajima7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesNichole Dolinsky / Darcy Karpman vs MinhTam Flynn / KhanhLinh Nguyen1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-04vs SD 4.0 Coronado TC (3:1)/ WebsterLost 13
L#1 DoublesGwen Schulz / Leanne Mariano vs Lana Kaiser / Yvonne Hwang4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesClare Lemon vs Kellie McMullen1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Hansen / Amanda Barnard vs Ashley Bull / Jane Khouw1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bucky / Andrea Van Soest vs Jill Webster / Deborah Boehm6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2026-01-28vs SD 4.0 SDTRC (3:1)/ HansonWon 31
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Pringle / Jessica Shehab vs Annie Chambers / Amy Hamric6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSarah Bruno vs Jaimee Brant0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNichole Dolinsky / Darcy Karpman vs Carol Harris / Tracy Nichols6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Hansen / Amanda Barnard vs Kristan Hanson / Naomi Gallego6-3, 6-2
2026-01-14vs SD 4.0 Peninsula TC (2:2)/ LightnerSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bucky / Darcy Karpman vs Birte Lightner / Cherie Hibbs3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Bruno vs Kim Latham0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJenelle Aris / Michelle Strachan vs Sue Sprague / Charlotte Francovalle6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHelen Farr / Lori Lovering vs Annette Sandage / Mary Greif6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-07vs SD 4.0 Mtn View (2:2)/ KanayamaWon 31
W#1 DoublesMichelle Strachan / Amanda Barnard vs Emi Kanayama / Joan Yngson7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesHelen Farr vs Paola Romo6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Pringle / Jessica Shehab vs Bea McLellan / Mariles Valencia6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDarcy Karpman / Jennifer Bucky vs Sara Fairbank / Irma Ibarra0-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · SD - Women - 4.0 WD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD LLW 4.0WD Mtn View/ Lee8027518220
2SD 4.0 La Jolla TC (3:1)/ Bourne71211127258
3SD 4.0 SDTRC (3:1)/ Kaufman62201227281
4SD 4.0 Coronado TC (3:1)/ Webster62191329261
5SD 4.0 Peninsula TC (2:2)/ Lightner53181431252
6SD 4.0 Barnes TC (3:1)/ Caringal44201230271
7SD 4.0 Barnes TC (2:2)/ Bucky26151742326
8SD 4.0 SDTRC (3:1)/ Hanson26122045325
9SD 4.0 Mtn View (2:2)/ Kanayama26112146338
10SD 4.0 Coronado HS (2:2)/ Hammond1772555339
11SD 4.0 Balboa TC (3:1)/ Davis1762656360

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Carolyn Pringle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Jenelle Aris
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.80
Amanda Barnard
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
Helen Farr
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.71
Nichole Dolinsky
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Michelle Strachan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Andrea Van Soest
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Lori Lovering
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Melissa Mead
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.48
Sarah Bruno
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
3.47
Darcy Karpman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.45
Jessica Shehab
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.40
Jennifer Bucky
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Leanne Mariano
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Clare Lemon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Gwen Schulz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Mariko Uyeda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Bucky + Jessica Shehab4161% games+12.8% vs expected
Darcy Karpman + Sarah Bruno4165% games+9.8% vs expected
Carolyn Pringle + Jessica Shehab3351% games+6.4% vs expected
Sarah Bruno + Jessica Shehab6457% games+6.1% vs expected
Jenelle Aris + Michelle Strachan8162% games+4.6% vs expected
Amanda Barnard + Michelle Strachan8556% games+0.6% vs expected
Jennifer Bucky + Michelle Strachan5254% games+0.1% vs expected
Darcy Karpman + Jennifer Bucky171551% games−0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Pringle
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
Jenelle Aris
11W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Amanda Barnard
111W–53L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Helen Farr
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Nichole Dolinsky
100W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Michelle Strachan
66W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.69
4
Andrea Van Soest
33W–38L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Lori Lovering
47W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
Melissa Mead
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Sarah Bruno
21W–18L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Darcy Karpman
94W–53L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Jessica Shehab
82W–42L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Jennifer Bucky
67W–47L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.40
Leanne Mariano
46W–63L career · 3 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.34
3.5
Clare Lemon
117W–140L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Gwen Schulz
38W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.30
3.5
Mariko Uyeda
64W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.