Teams

Kickin' Aces

Adult 55 & Over Summer · 6.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.12 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-20vs Simply Smashing TooLost 01
L#2 DoublesDorothy Hochman / Emily Klebanoff vs Kathy Treacy / Catherine Ellis0-6, 3-6
2022-08-13vs Simply Smashing TooLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Krauss / Katherina Rosqueta vs Carol Cressman / Catherine Ellis6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCaryl Donatucci / Dana Levitties vs Christine Coburn / Kathy Treacy1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDorothy Hochman / Emily Klebanoff vs LISA BILLINGS / Dena Bloom4-6, 2-6
2022-08-06vs Simply Smashing TooSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Krauss / Katherina Rosqueta vs Carol Cressman / Maureen Dowds6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCaryl Donatucci / Dorothy Hochman vs Christine Coburn / Andre Stormont2-6, 0-6
2022-07-30vs Simply Smashing TooLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Klebanoff / Cheryl Raiken vs Susan Sullivan / Joanne Uhle5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDana Levitties / Caryl Donatucci vs Colista Gemmell / Laurie Sherman2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Krauss / Katherina Rosqueta vs Catherine Ellis / Andre Stormont6-2, 6-0
2022-07-16vs Simply Smashing TooLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaryl Donatucci / Beth Miranda vs Carol Cressman / Maureen Dowds1-6, 0-6
2022-07-09vs Simply Smashing TooLost 12
L#1 DoublesDorothy Hochman / Amy Krauss vs Joanne Uhle / Susan Sullivan2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBonnie Pugh / Linda Young vs Carol Cressman / Maureen Dowds0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCaryl Donatucci / Dana Levitties vs Flo Messier / Kathy Treacy3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Simply Smashing Too0613511101
2Kickin' Aces0651330195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Amy Krauss
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.83
Dana Levitties
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Caryl Donatucci
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.64
Emily Klebanoff
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Katherina Rosqueta
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Linda Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Krauss + Katherina Rosqueta303 matchesnot enough data
Caryl Donatucci + Dana Levitties123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Krauss
69W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Dana Levitties
20W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Caryl Donatucci
7W–16L career · type S · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Emily Klebanoff
16W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
Katherina Rosqueta
26W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
Linda Young
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.