Teams

WPTC-Hill

2026 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 55 & Over-Winter-Evenings · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over-Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-20vs Orange/PhanLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Owen / Gabriel Noboa vs Long Vuong / Jeff Dunn5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesByron Jones / Ed Parks vs Greg Nicolay / Rob Haben4-6, 0-6
2026-02-13vs Orange/PhanLost 12
L#1 DoublesBing Tien / Robert Owen vs Tim Thomas / Greg Nicolay4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesByron Jones / Marvin Yee vs Long Vuong / Jeff Dunn3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesGabriel Noboa / Gary Graham vs Tracy Gill / Richard Cooper6-2, 6-4
2026-02-06vs Orange/PhanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEd Parks / Byron Jones vs Tom Phan / Long Vuong6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesGary Graham / Gabriel Noboa vs Scott Sullivan / Tracy Gill7-6, 6-3
2026-02-02vs Orange/PhanLost 02
L#1 DoublesGabriel Noboa / Gary Graham vs Greg Nicolay / Rob Haben3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarvin Yee / Byron Jones vs Tim Thomas / Roland Gutierrez1-6, 2-6
2026-01-23vs Orange/PhanLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarvin Yee / Byron Jones vs Rob Haben / Greg Nicolay3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRobert Owen / Bing Tien vs Scott Sullivan / Tracy Gill7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGary Graham / Gabriel Noboa vs Richard Cooper / Alfonso Vargas6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-16vs Orange/PhanLost 12
L#1 DoublesEd Parks / Byron Jones vs Tim Thomas / Greg Nicolay4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Owen / Bing Tien vs Alfonso Vargas / Richard Cooper6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGary Graham / Gabriel Noboa vs Long Vuong / Scott Sullivan6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over-Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Bing Tien
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Gary Graham
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.09
Gabriel Noboa
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Byron Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Don Hill
published
Ed Parks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Marvin Yee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gary Graham + Gabriel Noboa6549% games−7.8% vs expected
Marvin Yee + Byron Jones033 matchesnot enough data
Ed Parks + Byron Jones033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bing Tien
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Gary Graham
12W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Gabriel Noboa
6W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Byron Jones
2W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Don Hill
9W–9L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Ed Parks
1W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marvin Yee
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.