Teams

Heritage Bay - K. Keillor

2022 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesCheryl Copps / Maureen Rennie vs Nancy Sims / Christi Krieger6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKate Keillor / Liudmila Polonskaya vs Julie Pearson / Kristi Mann6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-03-04vs Fiddlers Creek - HirschWon 10
W#1 DoublesMonique Berlinger / Kate Keillor vs Fran Allen / Odette Kardek6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesKate Keillor / Maureen Rennie vs Pamela Ginzburg / Maria Oddy6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2022-02-18vs Bay Colony - B. AllenWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaureen Rennie / Cheryl Copps vs Laurie Hanson / Marci Fisher6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMonique Berlinger / Kate Keillor vs Lucy Harrop / Lesley Falvo6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKate Keillor / Hilda Champion vs Beverley Wilen / Robin Harper3-6, 2-6
2022-01-28vs COLLIER - Marco YMCA - J. SchaufusLost 02
L#1 DoublesCheryl Copps / Maureen Rennie vs Inge Lund / Jan Jackman3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHilda Champion / Kate Keillor vs Joyce Hail / Marla Hoffman2-6, 1-6
2022-01-21vs Pelican Marsh - GrecoWon 10
W#1 DoublesMonique Berlinger / Cheryl Copps vs Helen Wardell / Rhonda Noble6-1, 6-4
2022-01-14vs Royal Poinciana - DentonWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaureen Rennie / Cheryl Copps vs Paula Whitelaw / Patricia Marcell6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKate Keillor / Liudmila Polonskaya vs Laura Fitzgibbons / Catherine Deluce6-0, 6-2
2022-01-07vs Village Walk Bonita - J. MartinWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Copps / Maureen Rennie vs Janet Martin / Vicki MacE6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Maureen Rennie
published
2.94
Cheryl Copps
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.93
Monique Berlinger
published
Hilda Champion
published 3
2.71
Kate Keillor
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Copps + Kate Keillor182849% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maureen Rennie
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Cheryl Copps
235W–133L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.94
Monique Berlinger
14W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Hilda Champion
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Kate Keillor
171W–148L career · 7 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.