Teams

Hills/Dinh

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL - Men · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.69 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-11-20vs HCC - M. GibsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Voelker / Dustin Applebaum vs Karl-Edris Dessieu / JAMES ORTIZ7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesDustin Applebaum / David Voelker vs Jack Korta / Mark Nelson6-2, 6-4
2021-10-16vs Cheval 8 Horseman - M. HayesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Voelker / Ken Chin vs Matthew Hayes / Vincent Pravata6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBrian Maltass / Michael Palmer vs Ryan Hoecker / Nick Swantko6-1, 6-3
2021-09-25vs Fishhawk - O. CantuWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Voelker / Michael Gauthier vs Tycho Sanders / Omar Cantu6-1, 7-5
2021-09-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Maltass / Michael Palmer vs Caleb Elms / Bobby White7-5, 6-1
2021-09-11vs TYCC Crew - B. RockwoodWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Burdette / David Voelker vs Chris Stewart / Carl Wilander6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Sambaathkumar CS
published
3.69
Nick Clark
published
3.67
Bryant Moore
published 4
3.65
David Voelker
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.60
Dustin Applebaum
published 3.5
3.58
Derek DeBrocke
published 4
3.45
Michael Gauthier
published
3.45
Brandon Halm
published 3.5
3.41
Ken Chin
published
3.40
Chris Chee-A-Tow
published 3.5
3.33
Michael Palmer
published
Chi Ming Yu
published 3.5
3.25
Brian Maltass
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Joseph Harrington
published
Kareem Marshall
published
Ray Gonzalez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandon Halm + Michael Palmer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sambaathkumar CS
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Nick Clark
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Bryant Moore
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
David Voelker
109W–90L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Dustin Applebaum
19W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%22%78%
3.60
4
Derek DeBrocke
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.58
Michael Gauthier
22W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Brandon Halm
26W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
Ken Chin
21W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Chris Chee-A-Tow
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Michael Palmer
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Chi Ming Yu
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Brian Maltass
22W–44L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Joseph Harrington
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kareem Marshall
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ray Gonzalez
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.