Teams

LCRI-Richards/CSD

2023 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Women 8.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.35 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-07vs LAMO-Morris/NMPLost 01
L#2 DoublesJackie Gaine / Elizabeth Krogstie vs Sanjana Sudhir / Madison Lohnes2-6, 3-6
2023-09-30Won 20
W#1 DoublesKim Ezzo / Kelly Hallman vs Hannah Brown / Kelly Lesso6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAbbey Neff / Elizabeth Krogstie vs Jennifer Higgins / Lauren Woodward6-1, 6-0
2023-09-20Won 20
W#1 DoublesMaggie Lawrence / Kelly Hallman vs Jamie Krueger / Lauren Woodward6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJackie Gaine / Angela Stallman vs Morgan Hoecherl / Elizabeth Holum6-1, 6-2
2023-09-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesClaudia Bareis / Maggie Lawrence vs Madison Lohnes / Jaclyn Rock6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2023-08-26Won 20
W#1 DoublesToni Laney / Irma Laney vs Diana West / Caroline Pickup4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Ezzo / Elizabeth Krogstie vs Lisa Wilkins / Nancy Smith Wells6-0, 6-3
2023-08-19Won 20
W#2 DoublesMaggie Lawrence / Irma Laney vs Jamie Krueger / Jennifer Higgins6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJanna Huggins / Angela Stallman vs Ellyn Pavelka / Morgan Hoecherl6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.84
Abbey Neff
published 5
4.82
Sarah Cimmino
published
4.58
Toni Laney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.45
Maggie Lawrence
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.34
Kim Ezzo
published
4.29
Jackie Gaine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Irma Laney
published 4.5
4.07
Christine Richards
published 4.5
3.92
Kelly Hallman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.83
Angela Stallman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.81
Kristen Oliver
published
3.79
Janna Huggins
published 4
3.67
Elizabeth Krogstie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Claudia Bareis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Ezzo + Maggie Lawrence11165% games+9.1% vs expected
Toni Laney + Irma Laney18069% games+6.8% vs expected
Maggie Lawrence + Janna Huggins101247% games−1.3% vs expected
Angela Stallman + Jackie Gaine8365% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Hallman + Janna Huggins4251% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Oliver + Janna Huggins314 matchesnot enough data
Maggie Lawrence + Elizabeth Krogstie213 matchesnot enough data
Maggie Lawrence + Kelly Hallman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Abbey Neff
20W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
4.84
Sarah Cimmino
11W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
4.82
4.5
Toni Laney
173W–51L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%28%72%
4.58
4.5
Maggie Lawrence
153W–102L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
4.45
Kim Ezzo
21W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Jackie Gaine
92W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Irma Laney
42W–20L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Christine Richards
22W–19L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Kelly Hallman
126W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Angela Stallman
94W–48L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
Kristen Oliver
52W–33L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Janna Huggins
64W–61L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Elizabeth Krogstie
263W–129L career · 6 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Claudia Bareis
10W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.