Teams

DCC GREEN

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-07vs GTC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeather Benes / Emily O'Shaughnessy vs Suzette Emerson / Sanda McMillan6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLindsay Filsinger vs Derria Banta4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Harry / Sara McDonnell vs Linda Thurman / Alison Mizer6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-09-06vs APR-U REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesTia Wolkov / Kate Lively vs Cathy Shahan / Darlene Lowrie3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBrittany Rogers vs Stacey Gilmore6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHeather Benes / Gina Carbone Fenton vs Carolyn Jeffrey / Lynn LaTorre3-6, 3-6
2023-08-21vs DTC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesDory Pratt / Emily O'Shaughnessy vs Leslie Greer / Caroline Blakney5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKate Lively vs Annette Isham4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Harry / Julie Groves vs Christian Hawley / Kristin Bokelman6-2, 7-5
2023-08-14vs CACM SILVERLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Groves / Lindsay Filsinger vs Sarah Jensik / Patricia Olson7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesBrooke Simpson vs Melissa Heine4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMegan Harry / Dory Pratt vs Jodi Brown / Nikki Widner4-6, 4-6
2023-08-07vs CACM NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Benes / Gina Carbone Fenton vs Emily Pruisner / Monique Wehrle4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLindsay Filsinger vs Elizabeth Kirkpatrick2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Simpson / Sara McDonnell vs Sara Vanek / Heather Mitchell4-6, 3-6
2023-07-31vs CP ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesDory Pratt / Sara McDonnell vs Margaret Fell / Kris Staaf-Bendixen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrittany Rogers vs Cynthia Lopez6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Groves / Gina Carbone Fenton vs Denise Geiger / Susan Nakano6-1, 6-3
2023-07-27vs CM REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesDory Pratt / Lindsay Filsinger vs Mary Vivo / Lea VanSchaack6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSara McDonnell vs Taylor Pardun4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Harry / Brittany Rogers vs Margaret Deline / Cindy Sawyer4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Brittany Rogers
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Lindsay Filsinger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.42
Tia Wolkov
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Brooke Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Sara McDonnell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.28
Emily O'Shaughnessy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Gina Carbone Fenton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Heather Benes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Megan Harry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Dory Pratt
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Kate Lively
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Julie Groves
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Groves + Lindsay Filsinger4166% games+17.3% vs expected
Lindsay Filsinger + Brittany Rogers9259% games+10.7% vs expected
Dory Pratt + Lindsay Filsinger5066% games+9.8% vs expected
Sara McDonnell + Kate Lively14360% games+5.6% vs expected
Megan Harry + Sara McDonnell3252% games+4.1% vs expected
Sara McDonnell + Lindsay Filsinger8363% games+4.1% vs expected
Brooke Simpson + Sara McDonnell8356% games+2.9% vs expected
Heather Benes + Gina Carbone Fenton271353% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brittany Rogers
42W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Lindsay Filsinger
107W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Tia Wolkov
108W–37L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Brooke Simpson
63W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Sara McDonnell
57W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Emily O'Shaughnessy
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Gina Carbone Fenton
51W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Heather Benes
60W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Megan Harry
38W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Dory Pratt
66W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Kate Lively
63W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Julie Groves
39W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.