Teams

LCTA40/DiNicola/Dunes West

USTA 40 & Over Adult Mixed Doubles · 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-17vs LCTA40/Griffin-Hildreth/SneeFarmWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristy Miller / Christos Maltezos vs Heidi Hildreth / Jim Tuxworth4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnita Castles / Patrick Daly vs Maureen Harmon / Kevin Charlow6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNicole Cirifalco / Dan DiNicola vs Zuhal Bulut / Casey Cann6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-10vs LCTA40/Chapman/HamlinLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristy Miller / Christos Maltezos vs Aimee Hoffman / Chuck Wethington7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnita Castles / Thomas Warren vs Frances Wright / Dhiraj Baruah2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnya Kent / Matt Essig vs Dede Davidson / Max Immelman4-6, 4-6
2026-06-03vs LCTA40/Campbell-Nee/Park WestWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristy Miller / Dan DiNicola vs Anjanette Curry / Paul Curry7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnita Castles / Thomas Warren vs Terrence Tizzard / Dina Tizzard7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKristofer Harrison / Nicole Cirifalco vs Lisa Nee / Matt Marshall1-6, 1-6
2026-05-20vs LCTA (B) 3.0M 40 & Over (Evanko)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPatrick Daly / Christy Miller vs Yves Gege / Amy Kimball3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristos Maltezos / Neda Smith vs Michele Singletary / Stephen Riehm6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnita Castles / Matt Essig vs Dave Heagney / Mary Moore6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2026-05-13vs LCTA40/Tedford/I'ONLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle MacKes / Dan DiNicola vs Marianne Michallet / Josh Absher3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnya Kent / Mark Ryerson vs Roxanne Tedford / Ryan Tedford7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNeda Smith / Kristofer Harrison vs Anne Schmidt / Patrick Stewart3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-06vs LCTA40/Taylor/LTPDIWon 30
W#1 DoublesDan DiNicola / Anya Kent vs Nicholas Taylor / Ashley Kinsinger6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristy Miller / Christos Maltezos vs Andrew Leone / Lisa Leone6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesThomas Warren / Anita Castles vs Allison Dong / John Dong6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA40/Facello-Katz/Maybank6217716190
2LCTA (B) 3.0M 40 & Over (Evanko)5114412143
3LCTA (A) 3.0M 40 & Over (Carter)5315920194
4LCTA40/Chapman/Hamlin4211716156
5LCTA40/Tedford/I'ON429920163
6LCTA40/Barwick/St.Andrews44121230229
7LCTA40/DiNicola/Dunes West339922171
8LCTA40/Wright-Tramount/Maybank3581636247
9LCTA40/Campbell-Nee/Park West2481022174
10LCTA40/Griffin-Hildreth/SneeFarm2471125189
11LCTA 40/PERRY/ST. GEORGE2681634253
12LCTA40/Taylor/LTPDI1551327191

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Michelle MacKes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Anya Kent
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.96
Neda Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Christy Miller
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.87
Anita Castles
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Patrick Daly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Dan DiNicola
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Christos Maltezos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Mark Ryerson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Nicole Cirifalco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Kristofer Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Niren Kapoor
published
Matt Essig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Warren
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Neda Smith + Christos Maltezos224 matchesnot enough data
Anya Kent + Mark Ryerson224 matchesnot enough data
Neda Smith + Dan DiNicola213 matchesnot enough data
Anya Kent + Dan DiNicola213 matchesnot enough data
Christy Miller + Christos Maltezos213 matchesnot enough data
Christy Miller + Dan DiNicola213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle MacKes
86W–45L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Anya Kent
66W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Neda Smith
86W–81L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Christy Miller
76W–71L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Anita Castles
60W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Patrick Daly
17W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Dan DiNicola
40W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Christos Maltezos
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Mark Ryerson
24W–57L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Nicole Cirifalco
47W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
Kristofer Harrison
5W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Niren Kapoor
0W–15L career · no lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.31
Matt Essig
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Warren
9W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.