Teams

MEMPK GOLDSTEIN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-05-25vs FLYHS GRAFLost 01
L#1 DoublesTodd Goldstein / Mark Dale vs Matt Campbell / John Swenson3-6, 2-6
2022-05-17vs LTFCS ANEWALTLost 01
L#2 DoublesTodd Goldstein / Mark Dale vs David Clipsham / Chris Straub1-6, 4-6
2022-05-03vs LTFCS VANDEVEERLost 01
L#3 DoublesTodd Goldstein / Mark Dale vs Hamid Mortazavi / Mel Cooper2-6, 3-6
2022-04-26vs GOG ENGELAGEWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Dale / Todd Goldstein vs Rob Leach / John Abbott6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-04-19vs CCW MCCLELLANDWon 10
W#1 DoublesTodd Goldstein / John Tompkins vs Bruce Bugno / Paul Gustafson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Andy Field
published 3.5
Anthony Bohuslavsky
published 3.5
3.24
Hayden St.Romain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
John Tompkins
published
3.07
Mark Dale
published
2.96
Steven Rubin
published
2.90
Soowon Lee
published
2.86
Chad Houchin
published 3
2.85
Jason Nunnery
published
2.75
Todd Goldstein
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Daniel Schultz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Todd Goldstein + Mark Dale2536% games−2.4% vs expected
Mark Dale + John Tompkins0735% games−4.7% vs expected
Todd Goldstein + John Tompkins2337% games−7.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andy Field
120W–54L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Anthony Bohuslavsky
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Hayden St.Romain
2W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
John Tompkins
45W–53L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Mark Dale
12W–39L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Steven Rubin
19W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
Soowon Lee
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Chad Houchin
58W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
Jason Nunnery
28W–48L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Todd Goldstein
62W–68L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Daniel Schultz
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.