Teams

Keys/Robinson

2026 ADULT 18 & OVER SUMMER · 3.0 Men S26

13 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-16vs ChandlerLost 13
W#1 SinglesSungsoo Kim vs Anand Ghaywankar6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLaMont Robinson / Mark Henjum vs Peter Jauert / Brett Lillemoe0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesNate Maisel vs Douglas Burger3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHaresh Siva / Nathan Moore vs David Kemp / Curtis Chandler2-6, 2-6
2026-07-09vs Turnblad: Volley LlamasLost 23
L#1 DoublesJames Dezurik / Stan Opstad vs Jeff Hwang / Drew Turnblad3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesSungsoo Kim vs Jeffrey Eckerson7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNate Maisel / Nathan Moore vs Adam Neuger / Kyle Johnson2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesErik Bowes vs Wade Linkert6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTyler Keys / Michael Tomatz vs Travis Crow / Brian Price6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-07-02vs Kalugdan/JologLost 14
L#1 DoublesStan Opstad / Haresh Siva vs Brandon Holt / Hugo Westrelin1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSungsoo Kim vs Andrew Scheneman6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNate Maisel / Mark Henjum vs Joseph Kalugdan / Nate Hanes3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesThomas Devine vs Alex Herr0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Tomatz / LaMont Robinson vs Andrew Heal / Richard Kaung1-6, 2-6
2026-06-25vs Olig: MustangsLost 23
W#1 DoublesJames Dezurik / Tyler Keys vs Troy Blizzard / Joe Barnett6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesErik Bowes vs James Roth6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesStan Opstad / Mark Henjum vs Kendall Griffith / Cameron Olig0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLaMont Robinson vs Eric Douville2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Tomatz / Nate Maisel vs Derek Wortman / Phil Ecker7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-18vs Limerick: The Drop BearsLost 13
L#1 DoublesJames Dezurik / Mark Henjum vs Orest Ladyzhynsky / Max Schumacher1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesErik Bowes vs Jeff Yoo3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaMont Robinson / Nathan Moore vs Mitch Bennett / Kit Fordham0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNate Maisel / Michael Tomatz vs Michael Bingham / Arun Mehta0-6, 2-6
2026-06-11vs Blesbois: Bagels and BreadsticksLost 14
L#1 DoublesHaresh Siva / James Dezurik vs Nick Ducharme / Nicholas Mattila6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesErik Bowes vs Zach Speyer3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTyler Keys / Thomas Devine vs Siddesh Iyer / Bill Blaine1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMark Henjum vs Matthew Farrells6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNathan Moore / Michael Tomatz vs Robert James / Bryan Kasberg2-6, 1-6
2026-05-21vs ChandlerLost 23
W#1 DoublesTyler Keys / James Dezurik vs Keith Gardner / Peter Jauert6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSungsoo Kim vs Michael Finn7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesStan Opstad / LaMont Robinson vs Anand Ghaywankar / Curtis Chandler1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesErik Bowes vs Hadi Modares4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMark Henjum / Michael Tomatz vs Brett Lillemoe / Douglas Burger1-6, 2-6
2026-05-14vs Turnblad: Volley LlamasLost 05
L#1 DoublesTyler Keys / Haresh Siva vs Josh Kasendorf / Adam Neuger7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLaMont Robinson vs Jeffrey Eckerson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Devine / Mark Henjum vs Marcus Hahler / Kyle Johnson1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSungsoo Kim vs Drew Turnblad5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Tomatz / Nathan Moore vs Rafael Feijo / Jeff Hwang0-6, 0-6
2026-05-07vs Olig: MustangsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTyler Keys / Erik Bowes vs Norman Abramson / Derek Wortman6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSungsoo Kim vs Marc Grabanski4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Devine / Nathan Moore vs Rob Leonard / Cameron Olig2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesRob Alexander vs Eric Douville1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.0 Men S26
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Turnblad: Volley Llamas81291638349
2Limerick: The Drop Bears62221840319
3Kalugdan/Jolog63261942371
4Olig: Mustangs35211942344
5Blesbois: Bagels and Breadsticks17142657404
6Keys/Robinson18153063425

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Sungsoo Kim
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
2.91
Tyler Keys
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.87
Erik Bowes
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.81
James Dezurik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Mark Henjum
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.61
Nate Maisel
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.59
Haresh Siva
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.52
Stan Opstad
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Matthew Pullen
published
2.48
LaMont Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.27
Michael Tomatz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Thomas Devine
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Rob Alexander
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Dezurik + Tyler Keys5066% games+16.9% vs expected
Haresh Siva + Tyler Keys5253% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sungsoo Kim
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Tyler Keys
13W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Erik Bowes
15W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
James Dezurik
7W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
Mark Henjum
2W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Nate Maisel
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
Haresh Siva
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
Stan Opstad
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Matthew Pullen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
LaMont Robinson
0W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
Michael Tomatz
0W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.27
Thomas Devine
4W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.25
Rob Alexander
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.