Teams

BARC - 3.5

2022 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Doubles Friday · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Kristin Sebright
published
3.43
Katha Allison
published
3.37
Frankie Erickson
published 3.5
3.37
Kim Fuke
published
3.26
Judy Peake
published
Barbara Starr
published 3.5
3.22
Marjorie Seiter
published
3.11
Marina Pronina
published
3.07
Jana Bryant
published
Michelle Holland
published
Roxanne Kamins
published
Sheetal Patel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frankie Erickson + Judy Peake27859% games+7.2% vs expected
Michelle Holland + Judy Peake314 matchesnot enough data
Marjorie Seiter + Jana Bryant033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Sebright
21W–12L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
Katha Allison
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Frankie Erickson
77W–54L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Kim Fuke
57W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Judy Peake
58W–33L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Barbara Starr
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marjorie Seiter
25W–33L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Marina Pronina
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Jana Bryant
9W–16L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
Michelle Holland
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Roxanne Kamins
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheetal Patel
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.