Teams

UPTA18TL/Nabke/Kroc

2025 UPTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - USTA · 18 TL Women - 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-27vs UPTA18TL/Tarallo/SportsclubLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelsey Mathias / Chrissy McCrary vs Denise Jacques / Sandra Hagler2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJoy Ivester / Marlena Nabke vs Tracie Segura / Kelly Lewis6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLINDSAY KAPLAN / Kelly Gauntner vs Rachael Shepherd / Cindy Gitlitz3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-20vs UPTA18TL/Pratt/RiverwalkLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Cunningham / Chrissy McCrary vs Natalie Bieber / Kirby King1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMarlena Nabke / Kelsey Mathias vs Holli Mayher / Van Nguyen2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLINDSAY KAPLAN / Kelly Gauntner vs Claudia Kornaros / Lara Knight6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 TL Women - 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Abigail Bliss
published 4
3.51
LINDSAY KAPLAN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Kelsey Mathias
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Chrissy McCrary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Kelly Gauntner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Marlena Nabke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Joy Ivester
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Teresa Strait
published
2.89
Alison Meagher
published 3
Margaret Gill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Ivester + LINDSAY KAPLAN2359% games+2.7% vs expected
Kelsey Mathias + Kelly Gauntner6353% games+0.0% vs expected
Kelly Gauntner + LINDSAY KAPLAN101549% games−4.0% vs expected
Marlena Nabke + Kelly Gauntner3250% games−6.8% vs expected
Marlena Nabke + Joy Ivester134 matchesnot enough data
Marlena Nabke + Kelsey Mathias123 matchesnot enough data
Kelsey Mathias + Chrissy McCrary213 matchesnot enough data
LINDSAY KAPLAN + Abigail Bliss213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abigail Bliss
16W–16L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.55
LINDSAY KAPLAN
28W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Kelsey Mathias
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Chrissy McCrary
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
Kelly Gauntner
22W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Marlena Nabke
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Joy Ivester
23W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
Teresa Strait
20W–26L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Alison Meagher
16W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Margaret Gill
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.