Teams

Schaff/18/6.5/CM/CP

2026 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 6.5 NO (18&O) Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 16 7:00 PM
Xavier University of Louisiana
Sep 23 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
Sep 30 6:30 PM
Lakeside Country Club
Oct 5 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
2026-08-31vs Staines/18/6.5/CM/LksdLost 03
L#1 DoublesJake Rosenfeld / Carl Monvoisin vs Marc Schexnayder / Greg Harris3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChris Raff / Eric Kaufman vs Chad Caldwell / Jim Buchler6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesIsaac Mudge / David Weiland vs Stephen Joubert / Scott Sarrat1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.5 NO (18&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cole/18//6.5/CM/GACC000000
2Schaff/18/6.5/CM/CP000000
3Page/18/6.5/CM/XU000000
4Staines/18/6.5/CM/Lksd000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
ANIL GULER
published 3.5
3.38
Michael Schaff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Kaio Noronha
published
3.28
Chris Raff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Isaac Mudge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Bert Miller
published 3
3.08
Eric Kaufman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Jean Luc Delpy
published
2.91
Carl Monvoisin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Gokmen Guler
published
2.70
David Weiland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

ANIL GULER + Gokmen Guler303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
ANIL GULER
22W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Michael Schaff
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Kaio Noronha
9W–15L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Chris Raff
17W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Isaac Mudge
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3
Bert Miller
26W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
Eric Kaufman
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
Jean Luc Delpy
8W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Carl Monvoisin
16W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%25%
2.91
Gokmen Guler
16W–20L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
3
David Weiland
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.