Teams

HMTC ORANGE

2026 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-29vs FCCC TEALWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Grim / Kristin Daniels vs Deanna Verchick / Jessica Allman3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMolly Bond vs Chanel Elliott3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKimberley Hattem / Susan Seiler vs Molly Skold / Jane Roberti6-1, 6-4
2026-07-22vs LVTA REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelsi Wagner / Susan Seiler vs Jessica Oldfield / Bethany Chambers1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMolly Bond vs Kristen McKnight1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Grim / Kimberley Hattem vs Bernita Sterling / CJ Roberts4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-07-15vs LT PURPLESplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelsi Wagner / Susan Seiler vs Tina Spicer / Shirley Moore6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Bond / Kristin Daniels vs Lee Anne Kempton / Janice Sale6-4, 6-2
2026-07-08vs FCCC TEALWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristin Daniels / Kelsi Wagner vs Victoria Archer / Carsen Bahn6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLori Masi / Susan Seiler vs Michelle Taylor / Ellen Qualls6-0, 6-1
2026-07-01vs LVTA REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesLori Masi / Jennifer Grim vs Bethany Chambers / Mary Beth Weir4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMolly Bond vs Kristen McKnight7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristin Daniels / Susan Seiler vs Maureen Maguire / Loretta Yabroff6-2, 6-4
2026-06-24vs LT PURPLEWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Masi / Jennifer Grim vs Tina Spicer / Pamela Massaro4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelsi Wagner / Susan Seiler vs Lee Anne Kempton / Janet Krech6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HMTC ORANGE5111717159
2LVTA RED249919155
3FCCC TEAL2481023165

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Lori Masi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Kelsi Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Jennifer Grim
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Kristin Daniels
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Molly Bond
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Susan Seiler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Kimberley Hattem
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Grim + Kristin Daniels5352% games+10.3% vs expected
Jennifer Grim + Lori Masi292553% games+1.0% vs expected
Kelsi Wagner + Susan Seiler6549% games−1.9% vs expected
Kimberley Hattem + Susan Seiler4546% games−4.7% vs expected
Kimberley Hattem + Jennifer Grim2448% games−5.5% vs expected
Susan Seiler + Lori Masi3350% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Daniels + Lori Masi224 matchesnot enough data
Kimberley Hattem + Kristin Daniels213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lori Masi
87W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Kelsi Wagner
32W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Jennifer Grim
84W–68L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Kristin Daniels
49W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Molly Bond
24W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Susan Seiler
30W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Kimberley Hattem
51W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.