Teams

DMurchElliot (WSRC)

2023 Combo Doubles 65 & Over League · 65 & Over 7.5 Men - Wed PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-04vs GBeal (Gaston CC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesGary Usher / Clarke Hobson vs Spurgeon Mackie / Phillip Morgan6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2023-09-27vs GBeal (Gaston CC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesSteven Todd / Jim Northrup vs James Matthews / David Shuman1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Murch Elliot / Gary Usher vs Spurgeon Mackie / John Lineberger3-6, 4-6
2023-09-14vs GBeal (Gaston CC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJerry Holman / Jim Northrup vs Gary Covitz / Robert Barbour3-6, 4-6
2023-09-06vs GBeal (Gaston CC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Duffy / Gary Usher vs William Harris / MARK TERRIO1-6, 1-6
2023-09-04vs GBeal (Gaston CC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJim Northrup / Steven Todd vs Robert Barbour / Gary Covitz2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGary Usher / Robert Duffy vs Erik Witten / Giles Beal1-6, 1-6
2023-08-23vs GBeal (Gaston CC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJim Northrup / Gary Usher vs Robert Barbour / Gary Covitz1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over 7.5 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Jerry Holman
published
3.59
Larry McCorkle
published
3.52
Chin Lin
published 3.5
3.43
Steven Todd
published
3.20
Jeff Allcock
published
3.18
Gary Usher
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.05
Jim Northrup
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Clarke Hobson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chin Lin + Jeff Allcock5164% games+14.7% vs expected
Jim Northrup + Clarke Hobson3354% gamesnot enough data
Gary Usher + Chin Lin224 matchesnot enough data
David Murch Elliot + Jeff Allcock213 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Allcock + Clarke Hobson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jerry Holman
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
Larry McCorkle
11W–13L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Chin Lin
83W–45L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.52
Steven Todd
21W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Jeff Allcock
26W–19L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Gary Usher
27W–77L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Jim Northrup
76W–82L career · 4 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Clarke Hobson
101W–51L career · type A · 1 line in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
David Murch Elliot
4W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.