Teams

T.Koves

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-01vs J.HillWon 10
W#1 DoublesPhilip Robertson / Mike Elstob vs Trey Morris / Alan Hicks6-3, 6-2
2023-04-24vs J.HulickiWon 10
W#2 DoublesTimothy Koves / GEORGE ELLISON vs Stephen Cole / Luis Torres6-1, 6-3
2023-04-17vs A.DecWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Elstob / Michael Hughes vs Edward Perkins / Stephen Kuss7-5, 7-5
2023-04-10vs D.DeMacy 3.5 40+Split 11
L#1 DoublesRick Smith / Timothy Koves vs Dylan DeMacy / Jason McGeorge2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMike Elstob vs Scott Hoffman2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-27Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTimothy Koves vs Joseph Brown7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-13vs A.Womack3.5 40+Split 11
L#1 DoublesMike Elstob / Michael Hughes vs Adam Deuel / Art Rimbert2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTimothy Koves / Kevin Duffy vs David Swann / James Worley6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Timothy Koves
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Mike Elstob
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Philip Robertson
published
3.22
Andrew Dudeck
published 3.5
3.15
David Lee
published 3.5
3.13
Rick Smith
published
3.05
Joel Broadway
published
2.61
Brent Berry
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timothy Koves + Mike Elstob14458% games+14.2% vs expected
Philip Robertson + Mike Elstob4446% games+0.8% vs expected
Philip Robertson + Timothy Koves4156% games+0.1% vs expected
Rick Smith + Timothy Koves213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Timothy Koves
232W–124L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Mike Elstob
117W–109L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Philip Robertson
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Andrew Dudeck
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
David Lee
3W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Rick Smith
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
Joel Broadway
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Brent Berry
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.