Teams

Do, Jennifer

2025 Team Singles-JXN · Women 4.0+

4 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-01-08vs Harrell, KimberlyLost 02
L#2 SinglesJennifer Otto vs Kimberly Harrell2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJessie Humble vs Elise Brewer2-6, 2-6
2025-12-20vs Harrell, KimberlyLost 02
L#1 SinglesJayme Griffin vs Lisa Jeffcoat1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJessie Humble vs Kimberly Harrell2-6, 0-6
2025-12-16vs Harrell, KimberlyLost 02
L#2 SinglesJennifer Otto vs Catherine Lewis0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJessie Humble vs Carley Fetz5-7, 1-6
2025-12-07vs Harrell, KimberlyLost 01
L#1 SinglesJennifer Otto vs Lisa Jeffcoat1-6, 0-6
2025-11-23vs Harrell, KimberlyLost 01
L#2 SinglesJennifer Otto vs Stacie Rector4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-13vs Harrell, KimberlyLost 02
L#2 SinglesJennifer Otto vs Kimberly Harrell1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJayme Griffin vs Catherine Lewis4-6, 4-6
2025-10-26vs Harrell, KimberlySplit 11
W#1 SinglesJessie Humble vs Carley Fetz6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesJayme Griffin vs Elise Brewer4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 4.0+
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Harrell, Kimberly702014118
2Do, Jennifer0712040243

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Jayme Griffin
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.85
Jessie Humble
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.85
Sarah Buffington
published
3.74
Jennifer Otto
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessie Humble + Jennifer Otto3358% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Buffington + Jessie Humble123 matchesnot enough data
Jayme Griffin + Jennifer Otto303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jayme Griffin
96W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
Jessie Humble
84W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
Sarah Buffington
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%0%
3.85
Jennifer Otto
71W–48L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.