Teams

MLLCL-Cleveland/Fairbairn-NMP MX 40+ 4.0

2025 Lake 40 & Over USTA Mixed Doubles · Mixed 4.0 Tues pm 40+

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-29vs MLAWA-WARD/RR MX 40+ 4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesJane Ravey / Joakim Diedrichs vs Frances Daymude / Rich Brock6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSarah Hoglund / Gordon Ogden vs Lisa Squatriglia / Robert Squatriglia6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Higgins / Michael di Benedictis vs Meredith Ortiz / Ben Ward6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-07-22vs MLJPA-Patterson/CSD SPARTANWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Krogstie / Matthew Fairbairn vs Donna Upchurch / Tom McElhenny6-4, 6-4
2025-07-15vs MLLAL-Altamura PeninsulaLost 01
L#1 DoublesRon Herrmann / Elizabeth Krogstie vs Bill Moore / Debbie Newman2-6, 4-6
2025-07-08vs MLDBA-Baker/NMP 40 _MX 4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesJane Ravey / Joakim Diedrichs vs Leta Wiley / Roberto Caballero6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Hoglund / Ron Herrmann vs Keri Norcross / Dave Dehn7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2025-06-24vs MLSSR-Sree/NMP/Mxd40Won 20
W#1 DoublesJane Ravey / Joakim Diedrichs vs Karen Hallman / Robert Lough4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaurie Cleveland / Michael di Benedictis vs Julie Yencer / Sreejith Sreedharan6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Krogstie / Matthew Fairbairn vs Karla Williams / Ashok Kumar Kuppusamy7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 4.0 Tues pm 40+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Jamie Krueger
published
4.03
Joakim Diedrichs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.01
Sarah Hoglund
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Jane Ravey
published
3.87
Gordon Ogden
published
3.86
Laurie Cleveland
published
3.68
Todd Armstrong
published
3.68
Matthew Fairbairn
published
3.67
Elizabeth Krogstie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Jennifer Higgins
published
3.56
Michael di Benedictis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Amy Brandon
published 4
3.51
Todd Larsen
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jamie Krueger
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Joakim Diedrichs
54W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Sarah Hoglund
94W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.01
Jane Ravey
24W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Gordon Ogden
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
Laurie Cleveland
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Todd Armstrong
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Matthew Fairbairn
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Elizabeth Krogstie
263W–129L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Jennifer Higgins
28W–23L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Michael di Benedictis
69W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Amy Brandon
16W–30L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
Todd Larsen
20W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.