Teams

Roberts/6.5/55/MC/BTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 55 & Over - Men · 6.5 Shrev

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-04vs Taravella/6.5/55/MC/BTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesEddie Holman / Matthew Chaisson vs Jason Taravella / Tony Staton6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDennis Alexander / Mark Bissell vs Robert Burleson / Bob Waits6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDwayne Slack / Mark Roberts vs Gary McDonald / Timothy Walsh6-0, 6-3
2025-09-27vs Taravella/6.5/55/MC/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobert Kyle / Timothy Miles vs Jeff Howard / Robert Burleson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEddie Holman / Matthew Chaisson vs Jason Taravella / Russell Hightower6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesThomas O'Brien / Mark Roberts vs Jay Boyd / Gary McDonald6-3, 6-4
2025-09-13vs Taravella/6.5/55/MC/BTCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesThomas O'Brien / WILLIAM ALLRED vs Jeff Howard / Robert Burleson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Kyle / Matthew Chaisson vs Todd Eppler / Bob Waits6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Robert Kyle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Eddie Holman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Dwayne Slack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Matthew Chaisson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Thomas O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Dennis Alexander
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Mark Bissell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Timothy Miles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
WILLIAM ALLRED
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dwayne Slack + Dennis Alexander2351% gamesnot enough data
Eddie Holman + Dwayne Slack404 matchesnot enough data
Mark Bissell + Matthew Chaisson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Kyle
37W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.48
Eddie Holman
25W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Dwayne Slack
25W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Matthew Chaisson
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
Thomas O'Brien
23W–20L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Dennis Alexander
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mark Bissell
18W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.21
Timothy Miles
17W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
WILLIAM ALLRED
18W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.