Teams

UPTA65M/Woerz/Keowee Key

2026 UPTA Mixed 65 & Over - USTA · 65+ Mixed - 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-19vs UPTA (A) 3.5M 65 & Over (Bridges)Won 30
W#1 DoublesCurt Ulliman / Dana Loring vs Donald Kesling / Carol Douglas6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRoch Johnson / Sharon Thomas vs Mary Jordan / Scott Callison6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRalph Mosca / Charlotte Cobos vs Terry Orr / Annette Curin6-3, 6-0
2026-06-12vs UPTA (A) 3.5M 65 & Over (Bridges)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Aylor / Aimee Fountain vs Donald Kesling / Donetta Dodwell4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRoch Johnson / Carolyn Foster vs Tom Sunshine / Annette Curin6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDean Twedt / Catherine Twedt vs David Fisher / Peg Loyd4-6, 6-7
2026-06-05vs UPTA (A) 3.5M 65 & Over (Bridges)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRalph Mosca / Sarah Mosca vs Randel Cooper / Annette Curin3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAdrianne Brandecker / Allan White vs David Fisher / Carol Douglas2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Thomas / Kenneth Uhlig vs Scott Callison / Kelly Gaber2-6, 0-6
2026-05-29vs UPTA (A) 3.5M 65 & Over (Bridges)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCurt Ulliman / Dana Loring vs Randel Cooper / Teresa Carson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKenneth Uhlig / Christine Woerz vs David Fisher / Carol Douglas1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Aylor / Adrianne Brandecker vs Rickey Bridges / Kelly Gaber6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2026-05-15vs UPTA (A) 3.5M 65 & Over (Bridges)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRoch Johnson / Dana Loring vs Scott Callison / Donetta Dodwell1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRalph Mosca / Sharon Thomas vs Mary Jordan / David Fisher4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStephen Woerz / Charlotte Cobos vs Peg Loyd / Donald Kesling6-2, 6-0
2026-05-08vs UPTA (A) 3.5M 65 & Over (Bridges)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRalph Mosca / Sarah Mosca vs Teresa Carson / Randel Cooper1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDean Twedt / Aimee Fountain vs Scott Callison / Donetta Dodwell3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStephen Woerz / Christine Woerz vs Tom Sunshine / Annette Curin6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65+ Mixed - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
John Aylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Curt Ulliman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Ralph Mosca
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Sharon Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Dana Loring
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Dean Twedt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Kenneth Uhlig
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Charlotte Cobos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Roch Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Aimee Fountain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Christine Woerz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Carolyn Foster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Stephen Woerz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Adrianne Brandecker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Catherine Twedt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Rod Osborn
published
Sarah Mosca
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Twedt + Dean Twedt2545% games−12.8% vs expected
Ralph Mosca + Sharon Thomas3254% gamesnot enough data
Christine Woerz + Stephen Woerz314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Aylor
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Curt Ulliman
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Ralph Mosca
19W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.40
Sharon Thomas
33W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Dana Loring
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Dean Twedt
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Kenneth Uhlig
20W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Charlotte Cobos
9W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Roch Johnson
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Aimee Fountain
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Christine Woerz
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Carolyn Foster
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Stephen Woerz
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Adrianne Brandecker
12W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Catherine Twedt
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
Rod Osborn
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Mosca
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.