Teams

Heavenly Cole

2022 Flex Singles - Winter · 3.5 Women

1 player · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-05-28vs KoeppenWon 10
W#1 SinglesHeavenly Cole vs Nancy Koeppen4-0
2022-04-30vs Mi Ae KimLost 01
L#1 SinglesHeavenly Cole vs Mi Ae Kim1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-25vs HALost 01
L#1 SinglesHeavenly Cole vs HA NGUYEN3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HA6060023
2Mi Ae Kim3232648
3Chanda Kunz2323646
4Heavenly Cole1212423
5McCall000000
6Koeppen05051060

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.45
Heavenly Cole
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Heavenly Cole
58W–96L career · 3 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.