Teams

Browne/Drennan

2026 NO Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Day · 8.5 NO (40&O) Women Day

15 players · average NTRP 4.12 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-25vs CordesLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Webster / Ashley Morici vs Amy Farnsworth / Kristin Blackwell2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSara McCall / Allison Hescock vs Sarah Jackson / Helen Jenkins6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathryn Talbot / Charlotte Meade vs Elizabeth Wooten / Sarah Feirn1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.5 NO (40&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Browne/Drennan000000
2Cordes000000
3Austin 8.5 40 day000000
4MCC 40+ 8.5 day000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Sara McCall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.23
Claire Karas
published 4.5
4.16
Cheryl Webster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Amanda Seale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.96
Kathryn Talbot
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Riley Kennedy
published
3.88
Cynthia Cook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
3.79
Allison Hescock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Ashley Morici
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Michele Prokop
published
3.49
Charlotte Meade
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Gretchen Drennan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Dodie Powers
published
Leslie Ehret
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Cook + Amy Macdiarmid Browne5452% games+0.8% vs expected
Allison Hescock + Michele Prokop2550% games−7.8% vs expected
Claire Karas + Michele Prokop314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Macdiarmid Browne + Ashley Morici303 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Morici + Charlotte Meade213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara McCall
10W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%9%
4.32
4.5
Claire Karas
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Cheryl Webster
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%1%
4.16
4
Amanda Seale
52W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.97
Kathryn Talbot
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.96
Riley Kennedy
20W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Cynthia Cook
26W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Amy Macdiarmid Browne
15W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Allison Hescock
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Ashley Morici
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Michele Prokop
10W–11L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Charlotte Meade
13W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.49
Gretchen Drennan
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.43
Dodie Powers
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Leslie Ehret
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.