Teams

3-JYoung-Eno

2022 Eno River Mixed 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult Mixed 6.0 evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-30vs 6-MAlimohammadi-EnoWon 20
W#2 DoublesJonda Young / Mark Piper vs Sasha Deutsch-Link / Steven Burger6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCourtney Carey / Okeith GREENE vs Ofer Eldar / Lindsay White6-3, 6-3
2022-07-20vs 7-LStraube-EnoSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCourtney Carey / Okeith GREENE vs Kyle Jackson / Becki Cleveland6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJonda Young / Mark Piper vs Neal Sugg / Kerry Espinola3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-07-06vs 2-ERyan-Eno-MixWon 10
W#3 DoublesJonda Young / Okeith GREENE vs Krissy Dunn / Christopher Peralta6-3, 6-2
2022-06-29vs 8-DLiller-HSSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCourtney Carey / Ted Case vs Tynita Edwards / Cory Draughon2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJonda Young / Mark Piper vs Jeff Denhard / Dori Liller7-5, 6-4
2022-06-27vs 1-AYoung-EVLost 01
L#2 DoublesJonda Young / Mark Piper vs Aaron Young / Ami Young4-6, 5-7
2022-06-22vs 5-SGraff-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesBerna Tareen / Okeith GREENE vs Matthew Feldt / Elizabeth Chan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-15vs 4-MLong-Eno-3.0mixLost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtney Carey / Okeith GREENE vs JAMES MONTAGUE / Lisa Montague2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult Mixed 6.0 evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Berna Tareen
published 3.5
2.98
Hannah Harvey
published 3
2.94
Okeith GREENE
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.72
Courtney Carey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.57
Kellie Johnson
published
2.36
Jonda Young
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Mark Piper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Carey + Okeith GREENE6554% gamesnot enough data
Jonda Young + Okeith GREENE404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Berna Tareen
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Hannah Harvey
21W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Okeith GREENE
48W–23L career · type M · 5 lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Courtney Carey
188W–154L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Kellie Johnson
18W–24L career · no lines in 2022
0%30%70%
2.57
2.5
Jonda Young
93W–183L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%86%14%
2.36
Mark Piper
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.