Teams

EW-YTC-Ferguson

2023 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 MEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-04-30vs WRAC-RechtinLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Darby / John Asriel vs Stephen Knox / Michael Bendtsen1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTerry Kempton / Bob Cox vs Steve Gundersen / Larry Woodward7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Whiteside / Dan Ferguson vs Stewart Cusick / David Jaquish6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-30vs WCCP-WillmanWon 21
L#1 DoublesBryan Stauffer / John Asriel vs Ray Willman / John Omlin7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Whiteside / Dan Ferguson vs Charles McElligott / Steve Lamberson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTerry Kempton / Robert Darby vs Francis Demateis / Bruno Caprez6-3, 6-2
2023-04-29vs EW-PC-BrownWon 21
L#1 DoublesTerry Kempton / Robert Darby vs Marc Spinner / John Hilmes3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDan Ferguson / David Whiteside vs Moe Davari / Craig Hansen7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBryan Stauffer / John Asriel vs Bryan Coles / Paul McDaniel6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PC-Brown2163880
2EW-YTC-Ferguson21451077

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bryan Stauffer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Dan Ferguson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
David Whiteside
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Robert Darby
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Howard
published
Terry Kempton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Whiteside + Dan Ferguson3255% gamesnot enough data
Robert Darby + Dan Ferguson2353% gamesnot enough data
Terry Kempton + Robert Darby213 matchesnot enough data
Steve Howard + Dan Ferguson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bryan Stauffer
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Dan Ferguson
19W–37L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
David Whiteside
15W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Robert Darby
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Steve Howard
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Terry Kempton
15W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.