Teams

HOCO-JACKSON

2025 · 2026 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for 2026 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Traci Ludicke
usually #1 Doubles 34%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
3.39
Kiara Laurent
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
3.30
Eima Sims
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.21
Kannikar Dobney
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
3.21
Charlie Arnold
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 41% · published 3.5
3.20
Amanda Collins
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 21% · published 3.5
3.16
Stephanie Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #1 Singles 26% · published
3.14
Amanda Woods
usually #2 Singles 31%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Emma Warren
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published 3.5
3.10
Jennifer Grady
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.88
Rolonda Gaskins
usually #3 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Jenny Jackson
published
Manoela Milanez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kannikar Dobney + Emma Warren9656% games+0.5% vs expected
Traci Ludicke + Jennifer Grady4256% games−3.4% vs expected
Charlie Arnold + Kiara Laurent404 matchesnot enough data
Traci Ludicke + Kiara Laurent224 matchesnot enough data
Rolonda Gaskins + Amanda Woods314 matchesnot enough data
Emma Warren + Kiara Laurent314 matchesnot enough data
Traci Ludicke + Amanda Woods123 matchesnot enough data
Rolonda Gaskins + Kiara Laurent213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Traci Ludicke
75W–63L career · 39 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
Kiara Laurent
73W–28L career · 31 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Eima Sims
9W–20L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.30
Kannikar Dobney
38W–10L career · 17 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Charlie Arnold
31W–26L career · 17 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Amanda Collins
16W–29L career · 14 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Stephanie Carlson
35W–21L career · 18 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Amanda Woods
27W–37L career · 15 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Emma Warren
38W–19L career · 17 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
Jennifer Grady
19W–27L career · 8 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
Rolonda Gaskins
61W–59L career · 27 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Jenny Jackson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Manoela Milanez
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.