Teams

Makris/LR/CCLR

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring 1 League · 5.0 Men - Local League at State

9 players · average NTRP 5.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-17vs Guy/RR/TexarkanaWon 21
L#1 DoublesAaron Hudson / Tiaan Steenkamp vs Cole Guy / Trent Brandon6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKevin Praphan vs Sebastian Romanos-garzon6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBishop Bass / Chris Nosari vs Casey Garretson / Ivan Michelli6-1, 6-2
2026-05-17vs Polk/Bentonville/INDWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrew Conover / Bishop Bass vs Patrick Wildman / Ralf Humbert6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJohn Makris vs Danny Polk2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJesse Ponwith / Grant Jones vs Edmund Hui / Yoshihisa Fujii6-2, 7-5
2026-05-16vs Polk/Bentonville/INDWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Conover / Chris Nosari vs Eddie Hunter / Adam Attas6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJesse Ponwith vs Danny Polk3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Makris / Grant Jones vs Ralf Humbert / Yoshihisa Fujii6-2, 6-2
2026-05-16vs Guy/RR/TexarkanaLost 12
L#1 DoublesAaron Hudson / Tiaan Steenkamp vs Trent Brandon / Jake Bridges3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKevin Praphan vs Sebastian Romanos-garzon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJesse Ponwith / Grant Jones vs Cole Guy / Casey Garretson2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men - Local League at State have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.69 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Grant Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Andrew Conover
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Bishop Bass
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
Chris Nosari
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.54
Jesse Ponwith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
John Makris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Kevin Praphan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Marc Heflin
published
Tiaan Steenkamp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Grant Jones
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
4.83
5
Andrew Conover
12W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Bishop Bass
5W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Chris Nosari
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jesse Ponwith
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.54
John Makris
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kevin Praphan
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marc Heflin
10W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tiaan Steenkamp
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.