Teams

King/Piedmont 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PM

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 3.0 Men Fall Singles Wed PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-15vs Augustine 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PMSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSaroj Patnaik vs Jackson Honeycutt6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSean Jones vs Caleb Evans6-2, 6-2
2025-10-08vs LeFevre 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PMSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRick Williamson vs Kevin VanVooren0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesBRIAN KING vs Gene LeFevre3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBRIAN KING vs MIKAEL SCHILL6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesHagen Molitoris vs JJ Flores5-7, 6-7
2025-09-24vs Vorys 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PMSplit 11
L#2 SinglesHagen Molitoris vs BRAD VANNOY3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesSean Jones vs Trevor Gilbert6-2, 6-3
2025-09-10vs Augustine 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesSaroj Patnaik vs Luke Mills2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSean Jones vs Jackson Honeycutt4-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesJack Monroe vs Caleb Evans6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-03vs LeFevre 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesSean Jones vs Arick Tuhro6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesSaroj Patnaik vs Anthony Scott Crawford3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesHagen Molitoris vs Noah Carlson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRick Williamson vs MIKAEL SCHILL3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesBRIAN KING vs Chris Swinyer6-1, 7-5
2025-08-20vs Vorys 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PMSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSean Jones vs Jack Royals1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesJack Monroe vs Chip Roth6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men Fall Singles Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
BRIAN KING
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.79
Saroj Patnaik
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.73
Sean Jones
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.63
Hagen Molitoris
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.33
Rick Williamson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Jack Monroe
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
BRIAN KING
28W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
Saroj Patnaik
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Sean Jones
15W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Hagen Molitoris
10W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
Rick Williamson
2W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.33
Jack Monroe
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.