Teams

GREEN VALLEY CC 55AW7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Rachel Chang
published
3.30
Anne Thurston
published 3.5
3.21
Lory Morar
published
3.19
Maureen Dugoni
published
3.14
Laura R Dougherty
published
3.10
Kimberly Thoma
published
3.07
Lana McAllister
published
3.03
Maggie Celestini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Kimberly McAlister
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Joanne McConlogue
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Jocelyn Frame
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Josephine Rosman
published
2.79
Yolanda Irigon
published
2.72
Carol Kim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Tina Barker
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Lowe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Kim + Jocelyn Frame4448% games−1.7% vs expected
Anne Thurston + Lana McAllister314 matchesnot enough data
Maureen Dugoni + Laura R Dougherty134 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly McAlister + Yolanda Irigon224 matchesnot enough data
Lana McAllister + Yolanda Irigon224 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Thoma + Laura R Dougherty213 matchesnot enough data
Laura R Dougherty + Lana McAllister033 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly McAlister + Maggie Celestini213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Chang
3W–24L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.63
3.5
Anne Thurston
25W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Lory Morar
13W–22L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Maureen Dugoni
11W–16L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Laura R Dougherty
13W–19L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.14
Kimberly Thoma
17W–20L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
Lana McAllister
13W–21L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07
Maggie Celestini
30W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
Kimberly McAlister
31W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Joanne McConlogue
19W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Jocelyn Frame
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Josephine Rosman
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
Yolanda Irigon
20W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Carol Kim
9W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
Tina Barker
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Jennifer Lowe
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.