Teams

PFC - UnbelievaBALLS

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spokane · 3.0 WOMEN Spokane

14 players · average NTRP 2.89 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-29vs Peak - CattellLost 13
L#1 SinglesLilia Kondo vs Jandi Stowell6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChelsea Brickner / Alexis Moore vs Nancy Hughes / Dianne Parcher2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesStacey Spohr vs Lauren Parker1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSamantha Norlin / Dee Beck Information Architect vs Roberta Bishop / Diane Haney1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-15vs SRC - ShawLost 13
W#1 DoublesAlyssa Walsh / Caroline Bennett vs Suzanne Griffin-Lawson / Heather Pina6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLilia Kondo vs Stefanie Hunsaker3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlexis Moore / Anne Schnurman vs Stephanie Butler / Rasa Morris6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPiper Peterson / Dee Beck Information Architect vs Kim Resleff / Mandy Manning0-6, 2-6
2025-03-02vs PFC - Fabulous @ FitLost 13
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Yahne / Lilia Kondo vs Alyson Gamache / Stefanie Collins2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDee Beck Information Architect vs Paula Siok0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCaroline Bennett / Piper Peterson vs MaryLynn Dodd / Shirlee Steiner4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnne Schnurman / Alexis Moore vs Heidi Rudy / Voni Tombari6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-02-08vs Peak - CattellSplit 22
L#1 DoublesStacey Spohr / Alyssa Walsh vs Natalie Queen / Lauren Parker3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAlexis Moore vs Diane Haney6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrita Frost / Lilia Kondo vs Kelly Gaston / Laura Bragg4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPiper Peterson / Dee Beck Information Architect vs Carolyn Schultz / Angie Stilson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-31vs PFC - Fabulous @ FitLost 13
W#1 DoublesCaitlin Yahne / Stacey Spohr vs Michelle Burgess / Heidi Rudy6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDee Beck Information Architect vs Stefanie Collins0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Bennett / Piper Peterson vs Cheryl Stransky / Marie Lambert2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAnne Schnurman / Chelsea Brickner vs MaryLynn Dodd / Voni Tombari1-6, 0-6
2025-01-25vs SRC - ShawSplit 22
W#1 SinglesStacey Spohr vs Stefanie Hunsaker0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrita Frost / Samantha Norlin vs Judy Chessar / Annelisa Riddle4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAlexis Moore vs Suzanne Griffin-Lawson6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCaroline Bennett / Lilia Kondo vs Kim Resleff / Mandy Manning4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN Spokane have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Alexis Moore
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.92
Alyssa Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.87
Caroline Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Caitlin Yahne
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
Alison Walton
published 3
Chelsea Brickner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.54
Lilia Kondo
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Brita Frost
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Dee Beck Information Architect
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.09
Anne Schnurman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jennifer Marion
published
Piper Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Samantha Norlin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Stacey Spohr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyssa Walsh + Caitlin Yahne3349% games+6.1% vs expected
Stacey Spohr + Caitlin Yahne4251% games+5.8% vs expected
Piper Peterson + Dee Beck Information Architect2345% games−0.5% vs expected
Anne Schnurman + Alexis Moore033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexis Moore
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3.5
Alyssa Walsh
17W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
Caroline Bennett
7W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Caitlin Yahne
8W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Alison Walton
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Chelsea Brickner
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lilia Kondo
7W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Brita Frost
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Dee Beck Information Architect
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Anne Schnurman
5W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Jennifer Marion
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Piper Peterson
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samantha Norlin
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Spohr
16W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.