Teams

Haggard 3.5W 65s Th AM

2024 Piedmont USTA 65 & Over · 3.5 Women 65 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Michelle Harris
published
3.14
Debra Hendricks
published 3.5
3.06
Shirley Keel
published
3.04
Christine Kendall
published 3.5
3.02
Patti Morgan
published
2.94
Betty Haggard
published 3.5
2.94
Deborah Young
published 3
2.92
Wanda Davis
published
2.87
Jacquelyn Larsen
published
Debra Elium
published 3
2.58
Carolyn Gayle
published 3
Gloria Eckman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wanda Davis + Michelle Harris0531% games−9.3% vs expected
Jacquelyn Larsen + Shirley Keel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Harris
21W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.15
3.5
Debra Hendricks
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
Shirley Keel
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Christine Kendall
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
3.04
Patti Morgan
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Betty Haggard
5W–23L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Deborah Young
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
Wanda Davis
2W–18L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
2.92
Jacquelyn Larsen
3W–13L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
2.87
3
Debra Elium
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Carolyn Gayle
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.58
Gloria Eckman
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.