Teams

Avalon 8.5 Mixed - Green

2024 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 8.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.08 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-16vs MRTC WILLIAMSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesByron Holmes / Caroline Ogilvie vs Collin Ward / Courtney Greiner3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMark Knee / Kristin Tetterton vs Eric Spivack / Denise Terrell6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-10Won 20
W#2 DoublesDaniela Otto / Mark Knee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCaroline Ogilvie / David Israel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-11-03vs Huguenot Park Stephens 8.5Split 11
L#2 DoublesDaniela Otto / Seth Nelson vs Lila LaCroix / Alex Neuwelt6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesByron Holmes / Kristin Tetterton vs Pearl Horng / Bradley Snyder6-4, 6-3
2024-10-27vs MAC SnowLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Lefkowitz / Connie Jervey vs Emily Huang / John Bennett6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMark Knee / Caroline Ogilvie vs Ellen Meyer / Matthew Morris2-6, 1-6
2024-10-13vs Burkwood Loos/SinsabaughWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristin Tetterton / David Lefkowitz vs Sam McKelvey / Logan Stone6-1, 6-2
2024-10-05vs Westwood KellySplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristin Tetterton / David Lefkowitz vs Lauren Jones / Ryan Baker7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesConnie Jervey / David Israel vs Cary Moore / Gil Elmaleh0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
David Lefkowitz
published 4.5
4.23
Byron Holmes
published 4.5
4.20
Mark Knee
published
3.97
Tejas Raval
published
3.82
Kristin Tetterton
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Connie Jervey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.61
Lara Green
published
3.56
Daniela Otto
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.38
Caroline Ogilvie
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Teresa Lancaster
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Lefkowitz
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Byron Holmes
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
Mark Knee
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.20
Tejas Raval
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Kristin Tetterton
155W–104L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Connie Jervey
111W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
Lara Green
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Daniela Otto
117W–203L career · 4 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Caroline Ogilvie
101W–84L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
Teresa Lancaster
7W–23L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.