Teams

Rubben/55/7.5/WC/QTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 55 & Over - Women · 7.5 Shrev

15 players · average NTRP 3.60 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-12vs Bihm/55/WN/7.5/SHTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAshlie Kyle / Amy Bowman vs Karen Sibert / Lora Slack2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTracy Elliott / Kelly Woodard vs Ginger Gustavson / Joy Dean6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKendra Wagnon / Deborah Hollis vs Denise Gordon / Lesley Harter6-0, 7-5
2025-10-07vs Cummer/55/7.5/WC/QTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesKendra Wagnon / Tracy Elliott vs Judy Tabor / Kate Chance6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Bowman / Ashlie Kyle vs Glenda Marsh / MLiss Sella6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLacey McCollum / Kirita Windham vs Robin Harris / Karen Easterling6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-10-04vs Cummer/55/7.5/WC/QTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandra Botzong / Kim Kitchens vs Diane Cord / Judy Tabor3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKirita Windham / Lacey McCollum vs Kate Chance / Jennifer West7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTracy Elliott / Kendra Wagnon vs Dana Hicks / Madeline Cummer6-1, 6-0
2025-09-28vs Cummer/55/7.5/WC/QTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKirita Windham / Kim Kitchens vs Kate Chance / Judy Tabor3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLynn Ferry-Nelson / Ashlie Kyle vs Shelly Valiulis / Betsy Sample3-6, 0-6
2025-09-20vs Bihm/55/WN/7.5/SHTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesRhonda Rubben / Lynn Ferry-Nelson vs Gina Bihm / Lora Slack2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLacey McCollum / Amy Bowman vs Sharon Regard / Karen Sibert6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDede Plette / Kelly Woodard vs Joy Dean / Katy Vincent3-6, 1-6
2025-08-30vs Bihm/55/WN/7.5/SHTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKendra Wagnon / Tracy Elliott vs Denise Gordon / Gina Bihm6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLynn Ferry-Nelson / Tammy Roberts vs Lora Slack / Lesley Harter6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSandra Botzong / Kim Kitchens vs Connie Hagan / Kathy Malone7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Tracy Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.70
Carol Matthews
published 4
3.62
Lynn Ferry-Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.55
Kirita Windham
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Sandra Botzong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Lacey McCollum
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.47
Amy Bowman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.34
Kendra Wagnon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Rhonda Rubben
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.23
Kelly Woodard
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.22
Deborah Hollis
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Ashlie Kyle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Kim Kitchens
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.05
Tammie Harris
published
2.86
Dede Plette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lacey McCollum + Lynn Ferry-Nelson4258% games−2.0% vs expected
Rhonda Rubben + Lynn Ferry-Nelson6553% games−3.0% vs expected
Sandra Botzong + Lacey McCollum3352% games−3.0% vs expected
Ashlie Kyle + Lynn Ferry-Nelson9554% games−5.3% vs expected
Kirita Windham + Lacey McCollum4253% gamesnot enough data
Kendra Wagnon + Tracy Elliott213 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Rubben + Lacey McCollum213 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Rubben + Kelly Woodard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Elliott
41W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Carol Matthews
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Lynn Ferry-Nelson
57W–42L career · 7 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
Kirita Windham
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Sandra Botzong
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Lacey McCollum
29W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Amy Bowman
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Kendra Wagnon
17W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Rhonda Rubben
45W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Kelly Woodard
20W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Deborah Hollis
13W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Ashlie Kyle
38W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Kim Kitchens
19W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Tammie Harris
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Dede Plette
21W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.