Teams

PRKR RED

2021 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · MEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

6 players · average NTRP 4.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-21vs NJ BLUEWon 10
W#1 Male DoublesNabeel Meghji / Christopher Johnson vs Yuhei Kasetani / Henry Carson6-3, 6-4
2021-07-14Won 20
W#1 Male SinglesJeff Aberle vs Darren Johnson6-1, 6-3
W#2 Male SinglesNabeel Meghji vs Cameron Struthers6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2021-07-07vs LTC REDLost 01
L#1 Male DoublesDaniel Dominic / Jeff Aberle vs Nicolai Lundy / Alexander Lundy2-6, 6-7
2021-06-30Won 20
W#1 Male DoublesNabeel Meghji / Daniel Dominic vs Alexander Manwaring / Thomas Cauchi1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 Male SinglesJeff Aberle vs Trent Bonczynski6-2, 6-1
2021-06-23Won 10
W#1 Male DoublesNabeel Meghji / Nathanael Arnold vs Andrew Bryson / Trae Beneck6-1, 6-4
2021-06-16vs NJ BLUEWon 20
W#1 Male DoublesNabeel Meghji / Daniel Dominic vs Meng Lian - (DQ) / Ian Walden6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 Male SinglesJeff Aberle vs Matthew Field7-5, 6-4
2021-06-09vs CR REDWon 10
W#1 Male DoublesNathanael Arnold / Jeff Aberle vs Kurt Delos Trino / Andrew Herr6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Sean Daniel
published
4.41
Christopher Johnson
published 4.5
4.08
Jeff Aberle
usually #1 Male Doubles 40%, also #1 Male Singles 40% · published 4.5
3.98
Daniel Dominic
published 4.5
3.84
Nabeel Meghji
usually #1 Male Doubles 80%, also #2 Male Singles 20% · published 4
Nathanael Arnold
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nabeel Meghji + Jeff Aberle5455% games+2.3% vs expected
Christopher Johnson + Nathanael Arnold033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sean Daniel
63W–25L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
4.43
4.5
Christopher Johnson
39W–20L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%24%
4.41
4.5
Jeff Aberle
98W–35L career · 5 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
4.08
4.5
Daniel Dominic
17W–16L career · no lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Nabeel Meghji
86W–55L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.84
Nathanael Arnold
20W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.