Teams

VCC BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-31vs CACM PINKWon 31
W#1 DoublesDebbie Groves / Kirklyn Simonton vs Sally Berglund / Angie Shappell6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDana Henry vs Andrea Gordon6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Blake / Susan Stewart vs Cynthia Smith / Jessica Pohl2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKelly Kelly / Danelle Morgan vs Carol Lovseth / Robin Ashmore-Guin6-3, 6-3
2022-05-24vs SSD GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesKirklyn Simonton / Melissa Blake vs Doreen Rogers / Kimberly Murphy6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDana Henry vs Margaret Wilson1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDanelle Morgan / Debbie Groves vs Carol McGaughey / Dawn Bergin6-2, 6-2
2022-05-17vs LTFC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Stewart / Holly Flora vs Ashley Gonzales / Dori Yaworski6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDana Henry vs Danielle Havard3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDebbie Groves vs Tracy Bourque6-2, 6-1
2022-05-10vs HFII BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesDebbie Groves / Danelle Morgan vs Paige Jones / Audra Ramsey6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDana Henry vs Sandra Stephenson6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMelissa Blake / Holly Flora vs Julie Sanders / Lauren Rundell7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTheresa Holyer / Susan Stewart vs Diane Vartuli / Joy Coulter-Brown2-6, 3-6
2022-05-03vs GCC REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKirklyn Simonton / Melissa Blake vs Kristen Abell / Jennifer Steelman6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesDana Henry vs Susan Foulkes2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Flora / Debbie Groves vs Hilary Marano / Diedre Wooden6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTheresa Holyer / Kelly Kelly vs Nicole Nies / Heather Froehlich-Olmsted4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-04-27vs SSLT BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelissa Blake / Danelle Morgan vs Linda Bartels / Mia Settlemire3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTheresa Holyer / Holly Flora vs Inge Bentz / Polly Klaus3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-19vs PTC REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesDebbie Groves / Theresa Holyer vs Michelle Pinkerton / Debra West3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDana Henry vs Christina Good6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHolly Flora / Melissa Blake vs Kari Miceli / Karen Wilson7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKelly Kelly / Danelle Morgan vs Liz Epstein Smith / Lauri Lehan6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTFC GOLD7031413225
2KC PINK7026919251
3PCRK TEAL7026927267
4LTA PURPLE6026415211
5GCC RED61241131295
6RHCC GREEN61201537303
7BCC ORANGE5121925217
8KC BRONZE5226927282
9CCC RED52221331283
10CPV ORANGE52201534297
11VCC BLUE43191636310
12LTFC TEAL43201539290
13SSD GREEN43171840313
14MEA TEAL43181741333
15GTC SILVER43161942333
16CACM PINK34201535289
17CACI BLUE34181737299
18HFII BLUE34142146343
19LTA ORANGE24121838276
20CACM TEAL25161942334
21BCC YELLOW25142144322
22GPTC GREEN25152044349
23BP GREEN25132248355
24CHCC GREEN25102550364
25SSHP ORANGE1692656371
26PH TEAL0772858381

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Kirklyn Simonton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Melissa Blake
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.78
Debbie Groves
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Dana Henry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Holly Flora
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Kelly Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Danelle Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Terra Croke
published
Theresa Holyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Henry + Melissa Blake5072% games+11.6% vs expected
Kelly Kelly + Kirklyn Simonton4163% games+10.2% vs expected
Danelle Morgan + Kirklyn Simonton8356% games+7.1% vs expected
Melissa Blake + Kirklyn Simonton8261% games+6.8% vs expected
Debbie Groves + Danelle Morgan7258% games+4.1% vs expected
Terra Croke + Theresa Holyer6159% games+3.5% vs expected
Debbie Groves + Kirklyn Simonton17461% games+2.9% vs expected
Dana Henry + Kirklyn Simonton4258% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirklyn Simonton
91W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.95
Melissa Blake
83W–54L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Debbie Groves
104W–44L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Dana Henry
95W–80L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Holly Flora
30W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly Kelly
30W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Danelle Morgan
51W–63L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Terra Croke
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Theresa Holyer
22W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.